From: Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:38:37 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Clarify that fastcc has a problem with nested function
X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7fef59f7e5bdcdf5d1b8a08d0e574c2b7f43888a;p=oota-llvm.git

Clarify that fastcc has a problem with nested function
trampolines, rather than with nested functions themselves.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@42955 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86CallingConv.td b/lib/Target/X86/X86CallingConv.td
index 525967ae933..5c8f75e495a 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86CallingConv.td
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86CallingConv.td
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ def CC_X86_32_TailCall : CallingConv<[
   // Promote i8/i16 arguments to i32.
   CCIfType<[i8, i16], CCPromoteToType<i32>>,
 
-  // Nested functions are currently not supported by fastcc.
+  // Nested function trampolines are currently not supported by fastcc.
   
   // The first 3 integer arguments, if marked 'inreg' and if the call is not
   // a vararg call, are passed in integer registers.