From: Cameron Zwarich Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 08:12:26 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Fix PR9398 - 10% of llc compile time is spent in Value::getNumUses. This reduces X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7c8d351d997655eb457bac5f810c219a9089594c;p=oota-llvm.git Fix PR9398 - 10% of llc compile time is spent in Value::getNumUses. This reduces the percentage of time spent in CodeGenPrepare when llcing 403.gcc from 12.6% to 1.8% of total llc time. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@127069 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CodeGenPrepare.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CodeGenPrepare.cpp index b4a1e450dc2..887fa9f004b 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CodeGenPrepare.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/CodeGenPrepare.cpp @@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeMemoryInst(Instruction *MemoryInst, Value *Addr, // are equivalent. Value *Consensus = 0; unsigned NumUsesConsensus = 0; + bool IsNumUsesConsensusValid = false; SmallVector AddrModeInsts; ExtAddrMode AddrMode; while (!worklist.empty()) { @@ -595,17 +596,31 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::OptimizeMemoryInst(Instruction *MemoryInst, Value *Addr, ExtAddrMode NewAddrMode = AddressingModeMatcher::Match(V, AccessTy,MemoryInst, NewAddrModeInsts, *TLI); - - // Ensure that the obtained addressing mode is equivalent to that obtained - // for all other roots of the PHI traversal. Also, when choosing one - // such root as representative, select the one with the most uses in order - // to keep the cost modeling heuristics in AddressingModeMatcher applicable. - if (!Consensus || NewAddrMode == AddrMode) { + + // This check is broken into two cases with very similar code to avoid using + // getNumUses() as much as possible. Some values have a lot of uses, so + // calling getNumUses() unconditionally caused a significant compile-time + // regression. + if (!Consensus) { + Consensus = V; + AddrMode = NewAddrMode; + AddrModeInsts = NewAddrModeInsts; + continue; + } else if (NewAddrMode == AddrMode) { + if (!IsNumUsesConsensusValid) { + NumUsesConsensus = Consensus->getNumUses(); + IsNumUsesConsensusValid = true; + } + + // Ensure that the obtained addressing mode is equivalent to that obtained + // for all other roots of the PHI traversal. Also, when choosing one + // such root as representative, select the one with the most uses in order + // to keep the cost modeling heuristics in AddressingModeMatcher + // applicable. unsigned NumUses = V->getNumUses(); if (NumUses > NumUsesConsensus) { Consensus = V; NumUsesConsensus = NumUses; - AddrMode = NewAddrMode; AddrModeInsts = NewAddrModeInsts; } continue;