From: Bill Wendling Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:18:44 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Use isPrologLabel() instead of checking the opcode directly. X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7490896f9dd4bb7955b39fa601ae7a9325e2775f;p=oota-llvm.git Use isPrologLabel() instead of checking the opcode directly. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108628 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp index 942b53a92dd..77d6ba14179 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ void AsmPrinter::EmitFunctionBody() { // label equaling the end of function label and an invalid "row" in the // FDE. We need to emit a noop in this situation so that the FDE's rows are // valid. - bool RequiresNoop = LastMI && LastMI->getOpcode()==TargetOpcode::PROLOG_LABEL; + bool RequiresNoop = LastMI && LastMI->isPrologLabel(); // If the function is empty and the object file uses .subsections_via_symbols, // then we need to emit *something* to the function body to prevent the