From: Chris Lattner Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:01:14 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Speed up codegen prepare from 3.58s to 0.488s. X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6686c6bf68148190309451aa9a79d2efd38ce698;p=oota-llvm.git Speed up codegen prepare from 3.58s to 0.488s. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@96081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Utils/BreakCriticalEdges.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Utils/BreakCriticalEdges.cpp index dac60131c3f..36573906224 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Utils/BreakCriticalEdges.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Utils/BreakCriticalEdges.cpp @@ -192,23 +192,47 @@ BasicBlock *llvm::SplitCriticalEdge(TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum, // If there are any PHI nodes in DestBB, we need to update them so that they // merge incoming values from NewBB instead of from TIBB. - // - unsigned BBIdx = 0; - for (BasicBlock::iterator I = DestBB->begin(); isa(I); ++I) { - // We no longer enter through TIBB, now we come in through NewBB. Revector - // exactly one entry in the PHI node that used to come from TIBB to come - // from NewBB. - PHINode *PN = cast(I); + if (PHINode *APHI = dyn_cast(DestBB->begin())) { + // This conceptually does: + // foreach (PHINode *PN in DestBB) + // PN->setIncomingBlock(PN->getIncomingBlock(TIBB), NewBB); + // but is optimized for two cases. - // Reuse the previous value of BBIdx if it lines up. In cases where we have - // multiple phi nodes with *lots* of predecessors, this is a speed win - // because we don't have to scan the PHI looking for TIBB. This happens - // because the BB list of PHI nodes are usually in the same order. - if (PN->getIncomingBlock(BBIdx) != TIBB) - BBIdx = PN->getBasicBlockIndex(TIBB); - PN->setIncomingBlock(BBIdx, NewBB); + if (APHI->getNumIncomingValues() <= 8) { // Small # preds case. + unsigned BBIdx = 0; + for (BasicBlock::iterator I = DestBB->begin(); isa(I); ++I) { + // We no longer enter through TIBB, now we come in through NewBB. + // Revector exactly one entry in the PHI node that used to come from + // TIBB to come from NewBB. + PHINode *PN = cast(I); + + // Reuse the previous value of BBIdx if it lines up. In cases where we + // have multiple phi nodes with *lots* of predecessors, this is a speed + // win because we don't have to scan the PHI looking for TIBB. This + // happens because the BB list of PHI nodes are usually in the same + // order. + if (PN->getIncomingBlock(BBIdx) != TIBB) + BBIdx = PN->getBasicBlockIndex(TIBB); + PN->setIncomingBlock(BBIdx, NewBB); + } + } else { + // However, the foreach loop is slow for blocks with lots of predecessors + // because PHINode::getIncomingBlock is O(n) in # preds. Instead, walk + // the user list of TIBB to find the PHI nodes. + SmallPtrSet UpdatedPHIs; + + for (Value::use_iterator UI = TIBB->use_begin(), E = TIBB->use_end(); + UI != E; ) { + Value::use_iterator Use = UI++; + if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast(Use)) { + // Remove one entry from each PHI. + if (PN->getParent() == DestBB && UpdatedPHIs.insert(PN)) + PN->setOperand(Use.getOperandNo(), NewBB); + } + } + } } - + // If there are any other edges from TIBB to DestBB, update those to go // through the split block, making those edges non-critical as well (and // reducing the number of phi entries in the DestBB if relevant). @@ -228,6 +252,15 @@ BasicBlock *llvm::SplitCriticalEdge(TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum, // If we don't have a pass object, we can't update anything... if (P == 0) return NewBB; + + DominatorTree *DT = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable(); + DominanceFrontier *DF = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable(); + LoopInfo *LI = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable(); + ProfileInfo *PI = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable(); + + // If we have nothing to update, just return. + if (DT == 0 && DF == 0 && LI == 0 && PI == 0) + return NewBB; // Now update analysis information. Since the only predecessor of NewBB is // the TIBB, TIBB clearly dominates NewBB. TIBB usually doesn't dominate @@ -252,7 +285,7 @@ BasicBlock *llvm::SplitCriticalEdge(TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum, bool NewBBDominatesDestBB = true; // Should we update DominatorTree information? - if (DominatorTree *DT = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable()) { + if (DT) { DomTreeNode *TINode = DT->getNode(TIBB); // The new block is not the immediate dominator for any other nodes, but @@ -283,7 +316,7 @@ BasicBlock *llvm::SplitCriticalEdge(TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum, } // Should we update DominanceFrontier information? - if (DominanceFrontier *DF = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable()) { + if (DF) { // If NewBBDominatesDestBB hasn't been computed yet, do so with DF. if (!OtherPreds.empty()) { // FIXME: IMPLEMENT THIS! @@ -317,7 +350,7 @@ BasicBlock *llvm::SplitCriticalEdge(TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum, } // Update LoopInfo if it is around. - if (LoopInfo *LI = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable()) { + if (LI) { if (Loop *TIL = LI->getLoopFor(TIBB)) { // If one or the other blocks were not in a loop, the new block is not // either, and thus LI doesn't need to be updated. @@ -398,7 +431,7 @@ BasicBlock *llvm::SplitCriticalEdge(TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum, } // Update ProfileInfo if it is around. - if (ProfileInfo *PI = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable()) + if (PI) PI->splitEdge(TIBB, DestBB, NewBB, MergeIdenticalEdges); return NewBB;