From: Eric Christopher Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:48:26 +0000 (+0000) Subject: If we have an unhandled type then assert, we shouldn't get here for X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=548d1bb97e6510d1e16299058a4bacb068ede13a;p=oota-llvm.git If we have an unhandled type then assert, we shouldn't get here for things we can't handle. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@112559 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMFastISel.cpp b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMFastISel.cpp index 10c7e5d6d27..a99f05fc053 100644 --- a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMFastISel.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMFastISel.cpp @@ -396,7 +396,9 @@ bool ARMFastISel::ARMEmitLoad(EVT VT, unsigned &ResultReg, assert(VT.isSimple() && "Non-simple types are invalid here!"); switch (VT.getSimpleVT().SimpleTy) { - default: return false; + default: + assert(false && "Trying to emit for an unhandled type!"); + return false; case MVT::i32: { ResultReg = createResultReg(ARM::GPRRegisterClass); // TODO: Fix the Addressing modes so that these can share some code.