From: Chris Lattner Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:46:33 +0000 (+0000) Subject: theoretically the negate we find could be in a different function, check X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1c91fae649734abe6f8271862fe3ba917e191279;p=oota-llvm.git theoretically the negate we find could be in a different function, check for this case. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92425 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp index 827b47d3fee..71d787a839a 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp @@ -414,6 +414,10 @@ static Value *NegateValue(Value *V, Instruction *BI) { // non-instruction value) or right after the definition. These negates will // be zapped by reassociate later, so we don't need much finesse here. BinaryOperator *TheNeg = cast(*UI); + + // Verify that the negate is in this function, V might be a constant expr. + if (TheNeg->getParent()->getParent() != BI->getParent()->getParent()) + continue; BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt; if (Instruction *InstInput = dyn_cast(V)) {