From: Dan Gohman Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:30:00 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Instead of testing whether an instruction dominates the loop preheader, X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=00cb67359fc2515eb972cd41fa35f8a0d2b22b87;p=oota-llvm.git Instead of testing whether an instruction dominates the loop preheader, test whether it properly dominates the loop header. This is equivalent when the loop has a preheader, and has the advantage of working when the loop doesn't have a preheader. Since IVUsers doesn't Require LoopSimplify, the loop isn't guaranteed to have a preheader. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@82899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Analysis/IVUsers.cpp b/lib/Analysis/IVUsers.cpp index ecb7df80cf1..543e017fc9d 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/IVUsers.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/IVUsers.cpp @@ -121,11 +121,11 @@ static bool getSCEVStartAndStride(const SCEV *&SH, Loop *L, Loop *UseLoop, Start = SE->getAddExpr(Start, AddRecStart); - // If stride is an instruction, make sure it dominates the loop preheader. + // If stride is an instruction, make sure it properly dominates the header. // Otherwise we could end up with a use before def situation. if (!isa(AddRecStride)) { - BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader(); - if (!AddRecStride->dominates(Preheader, DT)) + BasicBlock *Header = L->getHeader(); + if (!AddRecStride->properlyDominates(Header, DT)) return false; DEBUG(errs() << "[" << L->getHeader()->getName()