Revert a small part of 102372; this fixes at least one

of the dbg testsuite regressions.  I don't think this is
really the right fix; this change exposed an existing problem
upstream somewhere.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102410 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
index d663521abaf24b100569c14c5f8c2d4b7a1c31be..9d239c1bd7cfc515da0531907d58604a16941d94 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
@@ -3834,10 +3834,15 @@ SelectionDAGBuilder::visitIntrinsicCall(const CallInst &I, unsigned Intrinsic) {
         return 0;
       DAG.AddDbgValue(SDV, N.getNode(), isParameter);
     } else {
+      // Generating Undefs here seems to be actively harmful because it
+      // affects the line numbers.
+      return 0;
+#if 0
       // This isn't useful, but it shows what we're missing.
       SDV = DAG.getDbgValue(Variable, UndefValue::get(Address->getType()),
                             0, dl, SDNodeOrder);
       DAG.AddDbgValue(SDV, 0, isParameter);
+#endif
     }
     return 0;
   }