ARM: 5701/1: ARM: copy_page.S: take into account the size of the cache line
authorKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:26:33 +0000 (10:26 +0100)
committerRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:07:02 +0000 (22:07 +0100)
Optimized version of copy_page() was written with assumption that cache
line size is 32 bytes. On Cortex-A8 cache line size is 64 bytes.

This patch tries to generalize copy_page() to work with any cache line
size if cache line size is multiple of 16 and page size is multiple of
two cache line size.

After this optimization we've got ~25% speedup on OMAP3(tested in
userspace).

There is test for kernelspace which trigger copy-on-write after fork():

 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <unistd.h>

 #define BUF_SIZE (10000*4096)
 #define NFORK 200

 int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
         char *buf = malloc(BUF_SIZE);
         int i;

         memset(buf, 0, BUF_SIZE);

         for(i = 0; i < NFORK; i++) {
                 if (fork()) {
                         wait(NULL);
                 } else {
                         int j;

                         for(j = 0; j < BUF_SIZE; j+= 4096)
                                 buf[j] = (j & 0xFF) + 1;
                         break;
                 }
         }

         free(buf);
         return 0;
 }

Before optimization this test takes ~66 seconds, after optimization
takes ~56 seconds.

Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
arch/arm/lib/copy_page.S

index 6ae04db1ca4f2eb6b65732fd560798c3c8b63417..6ee2f6706f869b03c95f30d2b1a1cf7adf9086d9 100644 (file)
@@ -12,8 +12,9 @@
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
 #include <asm/assembler.h>
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/cache.h>
 
-#define COPY_COUNT (PAGE_SZ/64 PLD( -1 ))
+#define COPY_COUNT (PAGE_SZ / (2 * L1_CACHE_BYTES) PLD( -1 ))
 
                .text
                .align  5
 ENTRY(copy_page)
                stmfd   sp!, {r4, lr}                   @       2
        PLD(    pld     [r1, #0]                )
-       PLD(    pld     [r1, #32]               )
+       PLD(    pld     [r1, #L1_CACHE_BYTES]           )
                mov     r2, #COPY_COUNT                 @       1
                ldmia   r1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @       4+1
-1:     PLD(    pld     [r1, #64]               )
-       PLD(    pld     [r1, #96]               )
-2:             stmia   r0!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @       4
-               ldmia   r1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @       4+1
-               stmia   r0!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @       4
-               ldmia   r1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @       4+1
+1:     PLD(    pld     [r1, #2 * L1_CACHE_BYTES])
+       PLD(    pld     [r1, #3 * L1_CACHE_BYTES])
+2:
+       .rept   (2 * L1_CACHE_BYTES / 16 - 1)
                stmia   r0!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @       4
                ldmia   r1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @       4
+       .endr
                subs    r2, r2, #1                      @       1
                stmia   r0!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @       4
                ldmgtia r1!, {r3, r4, ip, lr}           @       4