lock_parent: don't step on stale ->d_parent of all-but-freed one
authorAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 04:29:13 +0000 (00:29 -0400)
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 04:29:13 +0000 (00:29 -0400)
Dentry that had been through (or into) __dentry_kill() might be seen
by shrink_dentry_list(); that's normal, it'll be taken off the shrink
list and freed if __dentry_kill() has already finished.  The problem
is, its ->d_parent might be pointing to already freed dentry, so
lock_parent() needs to be careful.

We need to check that dentry hasn't already gone into __dentry_kill()
*and* grab rcu_read_lock() before dropping ->d_lock - the latter makes
sure that whatever we see in ->d_parent after dropping ->d_lock it
won't be freed until we drop rcu_read_lock().

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
fs/dcache.c

index be2bea834bf459563e2d03e1e0fa8dec97b49c70..e99c6f529ba8bbd307bd5024cb723056b74afe17 100644 (file)
@@ -532,10 +532,12 @@ static inline struct dentry *lock_parent(struct dentry *dentry)
        struct dentry *parent = dentry->d_parent;
        if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
                return NULL;
+       if (unlikely((int)dentry->d_lockref.count < 0))
+               return NULL;
        if (likely(spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)))
                return parent;
-       spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
        rcu_read_lock();
+       spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 again:
        parent = ACCESS_ONCE(dentry->d_parent);
        spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);