// (set AL, (mul ...))
// This also handles implicit results like:
// (implicit EFLAGS)
- if (isRoot && Pattern.getDstRegs().size() != 0) {
+ if (isRoot && !Pattern.getDstRegs().empty()) {
// If the root came from an implicit def in the instruction handling stuff,
// don't re-add it.
Record *HandledReg = 0;
// At this point, we have however many values the result pattern produces.
// However, the input pattern might not need all of these. If there are
- // excess values at the end (such as condition codes etc) just lop them off.
- // This doesn't need to worry about flags or chains, just explicit results.
+ // excess values at the end (such as implicit defs of condition codes etc)
+ // just lop them off. This doesn't need to worry about flags or chains, just
+ // explicit results.
//
- // FIXME2: This doesn't work because there is currently no way to get an
- // accurate count of the # results the source pattern sets. This is because
- // of the "parallel" construct in X86 land, which looks like this:
- //
- //def : Pat<(parallel (X86and_flag GR8:$src1, GR8:$src2),
- // (implicit EFLAGS)),
- // (AND8rr GR8:$src1, GR8:$src2)>;
- //
- // This idiom means to match the two-result node X86and_flag (which is
- // declared as returning a single result, because we can't match multi-result
- // nodes yet). In this case, we would have to know that the input has two
- // results. However, mul8r is modelled exactly the same way, but without
- // implicit defs included. The fix is to support multiple results directly
- // and eliminate 'parallel'.
- //
- // FIXME2: When this is fixed, we should revert the terrible hack in the
- // OPC_EmitNode code in the interpreter.
-#if 0
- const TreePatternNode *Src = Pattern.getSrcPattern();
- unsigned NumSrcResults = Src->getTypeNum(0) != MVT::isVoid ? 1 : 0;
- NumSrcResults += Pattern.getDstRegs().size();
+ unsigned NumSrcResults = Pattern.getSrcPattern()->getNumTypes();
+
+ // If the pattern also has (implicit) results, count them as well.
+ if (!Pattern.getDstRegs().empty()) {
+ // If the root came from an implicit def in the instruction handling stuff,
+ // don't re-add it.
+ Record *HandledReg = 0;
+ const TreePatternNode *DstPat = Pattern.getDstPattern();
+ if (!DstPat->isLeaf() &&DstPat->getOperator()->isSubClassOf("Instruction")){
+ const CodeGenTarget &CGT = CGP.getTargetInfo();
+ CodeGenInstruction &II = CGT.getInstruction(DstPat->getOperator());
+
+ if (II.HasOneImplicitDefWithKnownVT(CGT) != MVT::Other)
+ HandledReg = II.ImplicitDefs[0];
+ }
+
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i != Pattern.getDstRegs().size(); ++i) {
+ Record *Reg = Pattern.getDstRegs()[i];
+ if (!Reg->isSubClassOf("Register") || Reg == HandledReg) continue;
+ ++NumSrcResults;
+ }
+ }
+
assert(Ops.size() >= NumSrcResults && "Didn't provide enough results");
Ops.resize(NumSrcResults);
-#endif
// If the matched pattern covers nodes which define a flag result, emit a node
// that tells the matcher about them so that it can update their results.