There was no way to check if a given register/mode pair was valid. We now return
an error code (-2) instead of asserting. If anyone thinks that an assert
at this point is really needed, we can autogen a hasValidDwarfRegNum instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132236
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
int Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(MLoc.getReg(), false);
for (const unsigned *SR = TRI->getSuperRegisters(MLoc.getReg());
- *SR && Reg == -1; ++SR) {
+ *SR && Reg < 0; ++SR) {
Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(*SR, false);
// FIXME: Get the bit range this register uses of the superregister
// so that we can produce a DW_OP_bit_piece
for (DwarfRegNumsMapTy::iterator
I = DwarfRegNums.begin(), E = DwarfRegNums.end(); I != E; ++I) {
int RegNo = I->second[i];
- if (RegNo != -2)
- OS << " case " << getQualifiedName(I->first) << ":\n"
- << " return " << RegNo << ";\n";
- else
- OS << " case " << getQualifiedName(I->first) << ":\n"
- << " assert(0 && \"Invalid register for this mode\");\n"
- << " return -1;\n";
+ OS << " case " << getQualifiedName(I->first) << ":\n"
+ << " return " << RegNo << ";\n";
}
OS << " };\n";
}