regulator: Reverse the disable sequence in regulator_bulk_disable()

Often there is a need for disabling a set of regulators in order opposite
to the enable order. Currently the function regulator_bulk_disable() walks
list of regulators in same order as regulator_bulk_enable(). This may cause
trouble, especially for devices with mixed analogue and digital circuits.
So reverse the disabling sequence of regulator_bulk_disable().
While at it, also correct the comment.

Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index ca86f39a0fdc824fba463f0eb30157ce933bbe9c..daba2f60f7d91a8e029dc069f8b430c39e826aca 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2463,8 +2463,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_bulk_enable);
  * @return         0 on success, an errno on failure
  *
  * This convenience API allows consumers to disable multiple regulator
- * clients in a single API call.  If any consumers cannot be enabled
- * then any others that were disabled will be disabled again prior to
+ * clients in a single API call.  If any consumers cannot be disabled
+ * then any others that were disabled will be enabled again prior to
  * return.
  */
 int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers,
@@ -2473,7 +2473,7 @@ int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers,
        int i;
        int ret;
 
-       for (i = 0; i < num_consumers; i++) {
+       for (i = num_consumers - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
                ret = regulator_disable(consumers[i].consumer);
                if (ret != 0)
                        goto err;
@@ -2483,7 +2483,7 @@ int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers,
 
 err:
        pr_err("Failed to disable %s: %d\n", consumers[i].supply, ret);
-       for (--i; i >= 0; --i)
+       for (++i; i < num_consumers; ++i)
                regulator_enable(consumers[i].consumer);
 
        return ret;