Why does g++ not even generate a warning when you miss a break statement?
authorVikram S. Adve <vadve@cs.uiuc.edu>
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:28:27 +0000 (12:28 +0000)
committerVikram S. Adve <vadve@cs.uiuc.edu>
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:28:27 +0000 (12:28 +0000)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@9317 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/Target/SparcV9/SparcV9InstrSelection.cpp

index a546f9134e32d32503dc41dc9e2a982619434773..9c4fcd610b72ab659cb5d1ddf3c385369a57fb5a 100644 (file)
@@ -2844,6 +2844,7 @@ GetInstructionsByRule(InstructionNode* subtreeRoot,
         int argSize = target.getFrameInfo().getSizeOfEachArgOnStack();
         mvec.push_back(BuildMI(V9::ADDi, 3).addReg(vaNextI->getOperand(0)).
                        addSImm(argSize).addRegDef(vaNextI));
+        break;
       }
 
       case 66: // reg:   VAArg (reg): the va_arg instruction