return SD->getFragment()->getAtom();
}
+// Try to fully compute Expr to an absolute value and if that fails produce
+// a relocatable expr.
+// FIXME: Should this be the behavior of EvaluateAsRelocatable itself?
+static bool evaluate(const MCExpr &Expr, const MCAsmLayout &Layout,
+ MCValue &Target) {
+ if (Expr.EvaluateAsValue(Target, &Layout))
+ if (Target.isAbsolute())
+ return true;
+ return Expr.EvaluateAsRelocatable(Target, &Layout);
+}
+
bool MCAssembler::evaluateFixup(const MCAsmLayout &Layout,
const MCFixup &Fixup, const MCFragment *DF,
MCValue &Target, uint64_t &Value) const {
++stats::evaluateFixup;
- if (!Fixup.getValue()->EvaluateAsRelocatable(Target, &Layout))
+ // FIXME: This code has some duplication with RecordRelocation. We should
+ // probably merge the two into a single callback that tries to evaluate a
+ // fixup and records a relocation if one is needed.
+ const MCExpr *Expr = Fixup.getValue();
+ if (!evaluate(*Expr, Layout, Target))
getContext().FatalError(Fixup.getLoc(), "expected relocatable expression");
bool IsPCRel = Backend.getFixupKindInfo(