--- /dev/null
+; This testcase contains a entire loop that should be removed. The only thing
+; left is the store instruction in BB0. The problem this testcase was running
+; into was that when the reg109 PHI was getting zero predecessors, it was
+; removed even though there were uses still around. Now the uses are filled
+; in with a dummy value before the PHI is deleted.
+;
+; RUN: as < %s | opt -adce
+
+%node_t = type { double*, %node_t*, %node_t**, double**, double*, int, int }
+
+implementation ; Functions:
+
+void %localize_local(%node_t* %nodelist) {
+bb0: ;[#uses=0]
+ %nodelist = alloca %node_t* ; <%node_t**> [#uses=2]
+ store %node_t* %nodelist, %node_t** %nodelist
+ br label %bb1
+
+bb1: ;[#uses=2]
+ %reg107 = load %node_t** %nodelist, uint 0 ; <%node_t*> [#uses=2]
+ %cond211 = seteq %node_t* %reg107, null ; <bool> [#uses=1]
+ br bool %cond211, label %bb3, label %bb2
+
+bb2: ;[#uses=3]
+ %reg109 = phi %node_t* [ %reg110, %bb2 ], [ %reg107, %bb1 ] ; <%node_t*> [#uses=1]
+ %reg212 = getelementptr %node_t* %reg109, uint 0, ubyte 1 ; <%node_t**> [#uses=1]
+ %reg110 = load %node_t** %reg212 ; <%node_t*> [#uses=2]
+ %cond213 = setne %node_t* %reg110, null ; <bool> [#uses=1]
+ br bool %cond213, label %bb2, label %bb3
+
+bb3: ;[#uses=2]
+ ret void
+}