: BaseType(RegBase), isRIPRel(false), Scale(1), IndexReg(), Disp(0),
GV(0), CP(0), ES(0), JT(-1), Align(0) {
}
+
+ bool hasSymbolicDisplacement() const {
+ return GV != 0 || CP != 0 || ES != 0 || JT != -1;
+ }
+
void dump() {
cerr << "X86ISelAddressMode " << this << "\n";
cerr << "Base.Reg ";
if (is64Bit && (TM.getCodeModel() != CodeModel::Small ||
AM.Base.Reg.getNode() || AM.IndexReg.getNode()))
break;
- if (AM.GV != 0 || AM.CP != 0 || AM.ES != 0 || AM.JT != -1)
+ if (AM.hasSymbolicDisplacement())
break;
// If value is available in a register both base and index components have
// been picked, we can't fit the result available in the register in the
// optimal (especially for code size consideration). LEA is nice because of
// its three-address nature. Tweak the cost function again when we can run
// convertToThreeAddress() at register allocation time.
- if (AM.GV || AM.CP || AM.ES || AM.JT != -1) {
+ if (AM.hasSymbolicDisplacement()) {
// For X86-64, we should always use lea to materialize RIP relative
// addresses.
if (Subtarget->is64Bit())