ACPICA: Do not use extended sleep registers unless HW-reduced bit is set
authorLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:59:18 +0000 (00:59 +0000)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:21:28 +0000 (18:21 -0700)
commit 7cec7048fe22e3e92389da2cd67098f6c4284e7f upstream.

Previous implementation incorrectly used the ACPI 5.0 extended
sleep registers if they were simply populated. This caused
problems on some non-HW-reduced machines. As per the ACPI spec,
they should only be used if the HW-reduced bit is set.  Lv Zheng,
ACPICA BZ 1020.

Reported-by: Daniel Rowe <bart@fathom13.com>
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54181
References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
Bisected-by: Brint E. Kriebel <kernel@bekit.net>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/acpi/acpica/hwxfsleep.c

index 35eebdac0f9d1e02976d382376005abbe4a870a5..09b06e2feff8073e8ae998befe35f8d20cf38c93 100644 (file)
@@ -240,12 +240,14 @@ static acpi_status acpi_hw_sleep_dispatch(u8 sleep_state, u32 function_id)
            &acpi_sleep_dispatch[function_id];
 
 #if (!ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE)
-
        /*
         * If the Hardware Reduced flag is set (from the FADT), we must
-        * use the extended sleep registers
+        * use the extended sleep registers (FADT). Note: As per the ACPI
+        * specification, these extended registers are to be used for HW-reduced
+        * platforms only. They are not general-purpose replacements for the
+        * legacy PM register sleep support.
         */
-       if (acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware || acpi_gbl_FADT.sleep_control.address) {
+       if (acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware) {
                status = sleep_functions->extended_function(sleep_state);
        } else {
                /* Legacy sleep */