mm/cma.c: fix typos in comments
authorShailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:58:03 +0000 (16:58 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:49:44 +0000 (17:49 -0700)
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
mm/cma.c

index 3a7a67b933942f5232091094f5d719d59bda13ab..661278025c46d125c95a5b94a4147a7be2838927 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
        if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       /* ensure minimal alignment requied by mm core */
+       /* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */
        alignment = PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order);
 
        /* alignment should be aligned with order_per_bit */
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
        /*
         * high_memory isn't direct mapped memory so retrieving its physical
         * address isn't appropriate.  But it would be useful to check the
-        * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justfiable to get
+        * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justifiable to get
         * the physical address from it.  On x86 there is a validation check for
         * this case, so the following workaround is needed to avoid it.
         */