X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lib%2FTarget%2FREADME.txt;h=69da35f1c7affb94eee03d829a40c9b3747946fa;hb=e10920d678c4d6046619e51770de1c9de0c3fe0a;hp=2af2d61a6c89d406a64a3fb5deaa7d4d84aab994;hpb=cea03cdb6946841a951f6c622b117459ea5ca157;p=oota-llvm.git diff --git a/lib/Target/README.txt b/lib/Target/README.txt index 2af2d61a6c8..69da35f1c7a 100644 --- a/lib/Target/README.txt +++ b/lib/Target/README.txt @@ -2,6 +2,29 @@ Target Independent Opportunities: //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// +Dead argument elimination should be enhanced to handle cases when an argument is +dead to an externally visible function. Though the argument can't be removed +from the externally visible function, the caller doesn't need to pass it in. +For example in this testcase: + + void foo(int X) __attribute__((noinline)); + void foo(int X) { sideeffect(); } + void bar(int A) { foo(A+1); } + +We compile bar to: + +define void @bar(i32 %A) nounwind ssp { + %0 = add nsw i32 %A, 1 ; [#uses=1] + tail call void @foo(i32 %0) nounwind noinline ssp + ret void +} + +The add is dead, we could pass in 'i32 undef' instead. This occurs for C++ +templates etc, which usually have linkonce_odr/weak_odr linkage, not internal +linkage. + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// + With the recent changes to make the implicit def/use set explicit in machineinstrs, we should change the target descriptions for 'call' instructions so that the .td files don't list all the call-clobbered registers as implicit @@ -83,7 +106,17 @@ Shrink: (setlt (loadi32 P), 0) -> (setlt (loadi8 Phi), 0) //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -Reassociate should turn: X*X*X*X -> t=(X*X) (t*t) to eliminate a multiply. +Reassociate should turn things like: + +int factorial(int X) { + return X*X*X*X*X*X*X*X; +} + +into llvm.powi calls, allowing the code generator to produce balanced +multiplication trees. + +First, the intrinsic needs to be extended to support integers, and second the +code generator needs to be enhanced to lower these to multiplication trees. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// @@ -96,7 +129,32 @@ int foo(int z, int n) { return bar(z, n) + bar(2*z, 2*n); } -Reassociate should handle the example in GCC PR16157. +This is blocked on not handling X*X*X -> powi(X, 3) (see note above). The issue +is that we end up getting t = 2*X s = t*t and don't turn this into 4*X*X, +which is the same number of multiplies and is canonical, because the 2*X has +multiple uses. Here's a simple example: + +define i32 @test15(i32 %X1) { + %B = mul i32 %X1, 47 ; X1*47 + %C = mul i32 %B, %B + ret i32 %C +} + + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +Reassociate should handle the example in GCC PR16157: + +extern int a0, a1, a2, a3, a4; extern int b0, b1, b2, b3, b4; +void f () { /* this can be optimized to four additions... */ + b4 = a4 + a3 + a2 + a1 + a0; + b3 = a3 + a2 + a1 + a0; + b2 = a2 + a1 + a0; + b1 = a1 + a0; +} + +This requires reassociating to forms of expressions that are already available, +something that reassoc doesn't think about yet. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// @@ -125,8 +183,7 @@ specific vector types are target dependent. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -We should add 'unaligned load/store' nodes, and produce them from code like -this: +We should produce an unaligned load from code like this: v4sf example(float *P) { return (v4sf){P[0], P[1], P[2], P[3] }; @@ -167,52 +224,14 @@ if anyone cared enough about sincos. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -Scalar Repl cannot currently promote this testcase to 'ret long cst': - - %struct.X = type { i32, i32 } - %struct.Y = type { %struct.X } - -define i64 @bar() { - %retval = alloca %struct.Y, align 8 - %tmp12 = getelementptr %struct.Y* %retval, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0 - store i32 0, i32* %tmp12 - %tmp15 = getelementptr %struct.Y* %retval, i32 0, i32 0, i32 1 - store i32 1, i32* %tmp15 - %retval.upgrd.1 = bitcast %struct.Y* %retval to i64* - %retval.upgrd.2 = load i64* %retval.upgrd.1 - ret i64 %retval.upgrd.2 -} - -it should be extended to do so. - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - --scalarrepl should promote this to be a vector scalar. - - %struct..0anon = type { <4 x float> } - -define void @test1(<4 x float> %V, float* %P) { - %u = alloca %struct..0anon, align 16 - %tmp = getelementptr %struct..0anon* %u, i32 0, i32 0 - store <4 x float> %V, <4 x float>* %tmp - %tmp1 = bitcast %struct..0anon* %u to [4 x float]* - %tmp.upgrd.1 = getelementptr [4 x float]* %tmp1, i32 0, i32 1 - %tmp.upgrd.2 = load float* %tmp.upgrd.1 - %tmp3 = mul float %tmp.upgrd.2, 2.000000e+00 - store float %tmp3, float* %P - ret void -} - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - Turn this into a single byte store with no load (the other 3 bytes are unmodified): -void %test(uint* %P) { - %tmp = load uint* %P - %tmp14 = or uint %tmp, 3305111552 - %tmp15 = and uint %tmp14, 3321888767 - store uint %tmp15, uint* %P +define void @test(i32* %P) { + %tmp = load i32* %P + %tmp14 = or i32 %tmp, 3305111552 + %tmp15 = and i32 %tmp14, 3321888767 + store i32 %tmp15, i32* %P ret void } @@ -236,13 +255,6 @@ _bar: addic r3,r3,-1 //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -Legalize should lower ctlz like this: - ctlz(x) = popcnt((x-1) & ~x) - -on targets that have popcnt but not ctlz. itanium, what else? - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - quantum_sigma_x in 462.libquantum contains the following loop: for(i=0; isize; i++) @@ -266,7 +278,7 @@ so cool to turn it into something like: ... which would only do one 32-bit XOR per loop iteration instead of two. It would also be nice to recognize the reg->size doesn't alias reg->node[i], but -alas... +this requires TBAA. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// @@ -313,6 +325,9 @@ unsigned int popcount(unsigned int input) { return count; } +This is a form of idiom recognition for loops, the same thing that could be +useful for recognizing memset/memcpy. + //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// These should turn into single 16-bit (unaligned?) loads on little/big endian @@ -372,14 +387,11 @@ we don't have whole-function selection dags. On x86, this means we use one extra register for the function when effective_addr2 is declared as U64 than when it is declared U32. -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - -Promote for i32 bswap can use i64 bswap + shr. Useful on targets with 64-bit -regs and bswap, like itanium. +PHI Slicing could be extended to do this. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -LSR should know what GPR types a target has. This code: +LSR should know what GPR types a target has from TargetData. This code: volatile short X, Y; // globals @@ -388,25 +400,22 @@ void foo(int N) { for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { X = i; Y = i*4; } } -produces two identical IV's (after promotion) on PPC/ARM: +produces two near identical IV's (after promotion) on PPC/ARM: -LBB1_1: @bb.preheader - mov r3, #0 - mov r2, r3 - mov r1, r3 -LBB1_2: @bb - ldr r12, LCPI1_0 - ldr r12, [r12] - strh r2, [r12] - ldr r12, LCPI1_1 - ldr r12, [r12] - strh r3, [r12] - add r1, r1, #1 <- [0,+,1] - add r3, r3, #4 - add r2, r2, #1 <- [0,+,1] - cmp r1, r0 - bne LBB1_2 @bb +LBB1_2: + ldr r3, LCPI1_0 + ldr r3, [r3] + strh r2, [r3] + ldr r3, LCPI1_1 + ldr r3, [r3] + strh r1, [r3] + add r1, r1, #4 + add r2, r2, #1 <- [0,+,1] + sub r0, r0, #1 <- [0,-,1] + cmp r0, #0 + bne LBB1_2 +LSR should reuse the "+" IV for the exit test. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// @@ -446,22 +455,6 @@ return: ; preds = %then.1, %else.0, %then.0 //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -Tail recursion elimination is not transforming this function, because it is -returning n, which fails the isDynamicConstant check in the accumulator -recursion checks. - -long long fib(const long long n) { - switch(n) { - case 0: - case 1: - return n; - default: - return fib(n-1) + fib(n-2); - } -} - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - Tail recursion elimination should handle: int pow2m1(int n) { @@ -495,25 +488,6 @@ entry: //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -"basicaa" should know how to look through "or" instructions that act like add -instructions. For example in this code, the x*4+1 is turned into x*4 | 1, and -basicaa can't analyze the array subscript, leading to duplicated loads in the -generated code: - -void test(int X, int Y, int a[]) { -int i; - for (i=2; i<1000; i+=4) { - a[i+0] = a[i-1+0]*a[i-2+0]; - a[i+1] = a[i-1+1]*a[i-2+1]; - a[i+2] = a[i-1+2]*a[i-2+2]; - a[i+3] = a[i-1+3]*a[i-2+3]; - } -} - -BasicAA also doesn't do this for add. It needs to know that &A[i+1] != &A[i]. - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - We should investigate an instruction sinking pass. Consider this silly example in pic mode: @@ -634,56 +608,11 @@ once. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -We should extend parameter attributes to capture more information about -pointer parameters for alias analysis. Some ideas: - -1. Add a "nocapture" attribute, which indicates that the callee does not store - the address of the parameter into a global or any other memory location - visible to the callee. This can be used to make basicaa and other analyses - more powerful. It is true for things like memcpy, strcat, and many other - things, including structs passed by value, most C++ references, etc. -2. Generalize readonly to be set on parameters. This is important mod/ref - info for the function, which is important for basicaa and others. It can - also be used by the inliner to avoid inserting a memcpy for byval - arguments when the function is inlined. - -These functions can be inferred by various analysis passes such as the -globalsmodrefaa pass. Note that getting #2 right is actually really tricky. -Consider this code: - -struct S; S G; -void caller(S byvalarg) { G.field = 1; ... } -void callee() { caller(G); } - -The fact that the caller does not modify byval arg is not enough, we need -to know that it doesn't modify G either. This is very tricky. - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - We should add an FRINT node to the DAG to model targets that have legal implementations of ceil/floor/rint. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -This GCC bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34043 -contains a testcase that compiles down to: - - %struct.XMM128 = type { <4 x float> } -.. - %src = alloca %struct.XMM128 -.. - %tmp6263 = bitcast %struct.XMM128* %src to <2 x i64>* - %tmp65 = getelementptr %struct.XMM128* %src, i32 0, i32 0 - store <2 x i64> %tmp5899, <2 x i64>* %tmp6263, align 16 - %tmp66 = load <4 x float>* %tmp65, align 16 - %tmp71 = add <4 x float> %tmp66, %tmp66 - -If the mid-level optimizer turned the bitcast of pointer + store of tmp5899 -into a bitcast of the vector value and a store to the pointer, then the -store->load could be easily removed. - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - Consider: int test() { @@ -814,57 +743,6 @@ be done safely if "b" isn't modified between the strlen and memcpy of course. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -We should be able to evaluate this loop: - -int test(int x_offs) { - while (x_offs > 4) - x_offs -= 4; - return x_offs; -} - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - -Reassociate should turn things like: - -int factorial(int X) { - return X*X*X*X*X*X*X*X; -} - -into llvm.powi calls, allowing the code generator to produce balanced -multiplication trees. - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - -We generate a horrible libcall for llvm.powi. For example, we compile: - -#include -double f(double a) { return std::pow(a, 4); } - -into: - -__Z1fd: - subl $12, %esp - movsd 16(%esp), %xmm0 - movsd %xmm0, (%esp) - movl $4, 8(%esp) - call L___powidf2$stub - addl $12, %esp - ret - -GCC produces: - -__Z1fd: - subl $12, %esp - movsd 16(%esp), %xmm0 - mulsd %xmm0, %xmm0 - mulsd %xmm0, %xmm0 - movsd %xmm0, (%esp) - fldl (%esp) - addl $12, %esp - ret - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - We compile this program: (from GCC PR11680) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4487 @@ -904,8 +782,21 @@ void bar(unsigned n) { true(); } -I think this basically amounts to a dag combine to simplify comparisons against -multiply hi's into a comparison against the mullo. +This is equivalent to the following, where 2863311531 is the multiplicative +inverse of 3, and 1431655766 is ((2^32)-1)/3+1: +void bar(unsigned n) { + if (n * 2863311531U < 1431655766U) + true(); +} + +The same transformation can work with an even modulo with the addition of a +rotate: rotate the result of the multiply to the right by the number of bits +which need to be zero for the condition to be true, and shrink the compare RHS +by the same amount. Unless the target supports rotates, though, that +transformation probably isn't worthwhile. + +The transformation can also easily be made to work with non-zero equality +comparisons: just transform, for example, "n % 3 == 1" to "(n-1) % 3 == 0". //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// @@ -926,20 +817,6 @@ int main() { //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -Instcombine will merge comparisons like (x >= 10) && (x < 20) by producing (x - -10) u< 10, but only when the comparisons have matching sign. - -This could be converted with a similiar technique. (PR1941) - -define i1 @test(i8 %x) { - %A = icmp uge i8 %x, 5 - %B = icmp slt i8 %x, 20 - %C = and i1 %A, %B - ret i1 %C -} - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - These functions perform the same computation, but produce different assembly. define i8 @select(i8 %x) readnone nounwind { @@ -987,18 +864,6 @@ The expression should optimize to something like //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -From GCC Bug 15241: -unsigned int -foo (unsigned int a, unsigned int b) -{ - if (a <= 7 && b <= 7) - baz (); -} -Should combine to "(a|b) <= 7". Currently not optimized with "clang --emit-llvm-bc | opt -std-compile-opts". - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - From GCC Bug 3756: int pn (int n) @@ -1010,19 +875,6 @@ Should combine to (n >> 31) | 1. Currently not optimized with "clang //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -From GCC Bug 28685: -int test(int a, int b) -{ - int lt = a < b; - int eq = a == b; - - return (lt || eq); -} -Should combine to "a <= b". Currently not optimized with "clang --emit-llvm-bc | opt -std-compile-opts | llc". - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - void a(int variable) { if (variable == 4 || variable == 6) @@ -1096,12 +948,6 @@ Should combine to 0. Currently not optimized with "clang //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -int a(unsigned char* b) {return *b > 99;} -There's an unnecessary zext in the generated code with "clang --emit-llvm-bc | opt -std-compile-opts". - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - int a(unsigned b) {return ((b << 31) | (b << 30)) >> 31;} Should be combined to "((b >> 1) | b) & 1". Currently not optimized with "clang -emit-llvm-bc | opt -std-compile-opts". @@ -1114,12 +960,6 @@ Should combine to "x | (y & 3)". Currently not optimized with "clang //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -unsigned a(unsigned a) {return ((a | 1) & 3) | (a & -4);} -Should combine to "a | 1". Currently not optimized with "clang --emit-llvm-bc | opt -std-compile-opts". - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - int a(int a, int b, int c) {return (~a & c) | ((c|a) & b);} Should fold to "(~a & c) | (a & b)". Currently not optimized with "clang -emit-llvm-bc | opt -std-compile-opts". @@ -1198,16 +1038,6 @@ optimized with "clang -emit-llvm-bc | opt -std-compile-opts". //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -We would like to do the following transform in the instcombiner: - - -X/C -> X/-C - -However, this isn't valid if (-X) overflows. We can implement this when we -have the concept of a "C signed subtraction" operator that which is undefined -on overflow. - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - This was noticed in the entryblock for grokdeclarator in 403.gcc: %tmp = icmp eq i32 %decl_context, 4 @@ -1229,6 +1059,8 @@ later. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// +[STORE SINKING] + Store sinking: This code: void f (int n, int *cond, int *res) { @@ -1284,6 +1116,8 @@ This is GCC PR38204. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// +[STORE SINKING] + GCC PR37810 is an interesting case where we should sink load/store reload into the if block and outside the loop, so we don't reload/store it on the non-call path. @@ -1311,7 +1145,7 @@ we don't sink the store. We need partially dead store sinking. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -[PHI TRANSLATE GEPs] +[LOAD PRE CRIT EDGE SPLITTING] GCC PR37166: Sinking of loads prevents SROA'ing the "g" struct on the stack leading to excess stack traffic. This could be handled by GVN with some crazy @@ -1328,88 +1162,64 @@ bb3: ; preds = %bb1, %bb2, %bb %10 = getelementptr %struct.f* %c_addr.0, i32 0, i32 0 %11 = load i32* %10, align 4 -%11 is fully redundant, an in BB2 it should have the value %8. - -GCC PR33344 is a similar case. +%11 is partially redundant, an in BB2 it should have the value %8. -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// +GCC PR33344 and PR35287 are similar cases. -There are many load PRE testcases in testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre* in the -GCC testsuite. There are many pre testcases as ssa-pre-*.c //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -There are some interesting cases in testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pred-comm* in the -GCC testsuite. For example, predcom-1.c is: - - for (i = 2; i < 1000; i++) - fib[i] = (fib[i-1] + fib[i - 2]) & 0xffff; - -which compiles into: - -bb1: ; preds = %bb1, %bb1.thread - %indvar = phi i32 [ 0, %bb1.thread ], [ %0, %bb1 ] - %i.0.reg2mem.0 = add i32 %indvar, 2 - %0 = add i32 %indvar, 1 ; [#uses=3] - %1 = getelementptr [1000 x i32]* @fib, i32 0, i32 %0 - %2 = load i32* %1, align 4 ; [#uses=1] - %3 = getelementptr [1000 x i32]* @fib, i32 0, i32 %indvar - %4 = load i32* %3, align 4 ; [#uses=1] - %5 = add i32 %4, %2 ; [#uses=1] - %6 = and i32 %5, 65535 ; [#uses=1] - %7 = getelementptr [1000 x i32]* @fib, i32 0, i32 %i.0.reg2mem.0 - store i32 %6, i32* %7, align 4 - %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %0, 998 ; [#uses=1] - br i1 %exitcond, label %return, label %bb1 +[LOAD PRE] -This is basically: - LOAD fib[i+1] - LOAD fib[i] - STORE fib[i+2] +There are many load PRE testcases in testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loadpre* in the +GCC testsuite, ones we don't get yet are (checked through loadpre25): -instead of handling this as a loop or other xform, all we'd need to do is teach -load PRE to phi translate the %0 add (i+1) into the predecessor as (i'+1+1) = -(i'+2) (where i' is the previous iteration of i). This would find the store -which feeds it. +[CRIT EDGE BREAKING] +loadpre3.c predcom-4.c -predcom-2.c is apparently the same as predcom-1.c -predcom-3.c is very similar but needs loads feeding each other instead of -store->load. -predcom-4.c seems the same as the rest. +[PRE OF READONLY CALL] +loadpre5.c +[TURN SELECT INTO BRANCH] +loadpre14.c loadpre15.c -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// +actually a conditional increment: loadpre18.c loadpre19.c -Other simple load PRE cases: -http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35287 [LPRE crit edge splitting] - -http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34677 (licm does this, LPRE crit edge) - llvm-gcc t2.c -S -o - -O0 -emit-llvm | llvm-as | opt -mem2reg -simplifycfg -gvn | llvm-dis //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -Type based alias analysis: -http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14705 +[SCALAR PRE] +There are many PRE testcases in testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-pre-*.c in the +GCC testsuite. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -When GVN/PRE finds a store of float* to a must aliases pointer when expecting -an int*, it should turn it into a bitcast. This is a nice generalization of -the SROA hack that would apply to other cases, e.g.: +There are some interesting cases in testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pred-comm* in the +GCC testsuite. For example, we get the first example in predcom-1.c, but +miss the second one: -int foo(int C, int *P, float X) { - if (C) { - bar(); - *P = 42; - } else - *(float*)P = X; +unsigned fib[1000]; +unsigned avg[1000]; - return *P; +__attribute__ ((noinline)) +void count_averages(int n) { + int i; + for (i = 1; i < n; i++) + avg[i] = (((unsigned long) fib[i - 1] + fib[i] + fib[i + 1]) / 3) & 0xffff; } +which compiles into two loads instead of one in the loop. -One example (that requires crazy phi translation) is: -http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16799 [BITCAST PHI TRANS] +predcom-2.c is the same as predcom-1.c + +predcom-3.c is very similar but needs loads feeding each other instead of +store->load. + + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +Type based alias analysis: +http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14705 //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// @@ -1417,13 +1227,27 @@ A/B get pinned to the stack because we turn an if/then into a select instead of PRE'ing the load/store. This may be fixable in instcombine: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37892 +struct X { int i; }; +int foo (int x) { + struct X a; + struct X b; + struct X *p; + a.i = 1; + b.i = 2; + if (x) + p = &a; + else + p = &b; + return p->i; +} +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Interesting missed case because of control flow flattening (should be 2 loads): http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26629 With: llvm-gcc t2.c -S -o - -O0 -emit-llvm | llvm-as | opt -mem2reg -gvn -instcombine | llvm-dis -we miss it because we need 1) GEP PHI TRAN, 2) CRIT EDGE 3) MULTIPLE DIFFERENT +we miss it because we need 1) CRIT EDGE 2) MULTIPLE DIFFERENT VALS PRODUCED BY ONE BLOCK OVER DIFFERENT PATHS //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// @@ -1690,20 +1514,6 @@ foo: //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// -Instcombine should replace the load with a constant in: - - static const char x[4] = {'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'}; - - unsigned int y(void) { - return *(unsigned int *)x; - } - -It currently only does this transformation when the size of the constant -is the same as the size of the integer (so, try x[5]) and the last byte -is a null (making it a C string). There's no need for these restrictions. - -//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// - The arg promotion pass should make use of nocapture to make its alias analysis stuff much more precise. @@ -1717,3 +1527,141 @@ int int_char(char m) {if(m>7) return 0; return m;} //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// +int func(int a, int b) { if (a & 0x80) b |= 0x80; else b &= ~0x80; return b; } + +Generates this: + +define i32 @func(i32 %a, i32 %b) nounwind readnone ssp { +entry: + %0 = and i32 %a, 128 ; [#uses=1] + %1 = icmp eq i32 %0, 0 ; [#uses=1] + %2 = or i32 %b, 128 ; [#uses=1] + %3 = and i32 %b, -129 ; [#uses=1] + %b_addr.0 = select i1 %1, i32 %3, i32 %2 ; [#uses=1] + ret i32 %b_addr.0 +} + +However, it's functionally equivalent to: + + b = (b & ~0x80) | (a & 0x80); + +Which generates this: + +define i32 @func(i32 %a, i32 %b) nounwind readnone ssp { +entry: + %0 = and i32 %b, -129 ; [#uses=1] + %1 = and i32 %a, 128 ; [#uses=1] + %2 = or i32 %0, %1 ; [#uses=1] + ret i32 %2 +} + +This can be generalized for other forms: + + b = (b & ~0x80) | (a & 0x40) << 1; + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +These two functions produce different code. They shouldn't: + +#include + +uint8_t p1(uint8_t b, uint8_t a) { + b = (b & ~0xc0) | (a & 0xc0); + return (b); +} + +uint8_t p2(uint8_t b, uint8_t a) { + b = (b & ~0x40) | (a & 0x40); + b = (b & ~0x80) | (a & 0x80); + return (b); +} + +define zeroext i8 @p1(i8 zeroext %b, i8 zeroext %a) nounwind readnone ssp { +entry: + %0 = and i8 %b, 63 ; [#uses=1] + %1 = and i8 %a, -64 ; [#uses=1] + %2 = or i8 %1, %0 ; [#uses=1] + ret i8 %2 +} + +define zeroext i8 @p2(i8 zeroext %b, i8 zeroext %a) nounwind readnone ssp { +entry: + %0 = and i8 %b, 63 ; [#uses=1] + %.masked = and i8 %a, 64 ; [#uses=1] + %1 = and i8 %a, -128 ; [#uses=1] + %2 = or i8 %1, %0 ; [#uses=1] + %3 = or i8 %2, %.masked ; [#uses=1] + ret i8 %3 +} + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +IPSCCP does not currently propagate argument dependent constants through +functions where it does not not all of the callers. This includes functions +with normal external linkage as well as templates, C99 inline functions etc. +Specifically, it does nothing to: + +define i32 @test(i32 %x, i32 %y, i32 %z) nounwind { +entry: + %0 = add nsw i32 %y, %z + %1 = mul i32 %0, %x + %2 = mul i32 %y, %z + %3 = add nsw i32 %1, %2 + ret i32 %3 +} + +define i32 @test2() nounwind { +entry: + %0 = call i32 @test(i32 1, i32 2, i32 4) nounwind + ret i32 %0 +} + +It would be interesting extend IPSCCP to be able to handle simple cases like +this, where all of the arguments to a call are constant. Because IPSCCP runs +before inlining, trivial templates and inline functions are not yet inlined. +The results for a function + set of constant arguments should be memoized in a +map. + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +The libcall constant folding stuff should be moved out of SimplifyLibcalls into +libanalysis' constantfolding logic. This would allow IPSCCP to be able to +handle simple things like this: + +static int foo(const char *X) { return strlen(X); } +int bar() { return foo("abcd"); } + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +InstCombine should use SimplifyDemandedBits to remove the or instruction: + +define i1 @test(i8 %x, i8 %y) { + %A = or i8 %x, 1 + %B = icmp ugt i8 %A, 3 + ret i1 %B +} + +Currently instcombine calls SimplifyDemandedBits with either all bits or just +the sign bit, if the comparison is obviously a sign test. In this case, we only +need all but the bottom two bits from %A, and if we gave that mask to SDB it +would delete the or instruction for us. + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +functionattrs doesn't know much about memcpy/memset. This function should be +marked readnone rather than readonly, since it only twiddles local memory, but +functionattrs doesn't handle memset/memcpy/memmove aggressively: + +struct X { int *p; int *q; }; +int foo() { + int i = 0, j = 1; + struct X x, y; + int **p; + y.p = &i; + x.q = &j; + p = __builtin_memcpy (&x, &y, sizeof (int *)); + return **p; +} + +//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// +