X-Git-Url: http://plrg.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=docs%2FWritingAnLLVMBackend.html;h=29dc1127c576f0a4c8e697069ceefd7cf8454cd4;hb=916afdbc2d4af2596894c4ccc179b4445fe659a7;hp=4066eec1dfaf0e5bb96d10c2c4c87b8cf1e3a62a;hpb=e940714e4e3cadca86e32a157e624af17e9962eb;p=oota-llvm.git diff --git a/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html b/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html index 4066eec1dfa..29dc1127c57 100644 --- a/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html +++ b/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html @@ -2,32 +2,62 @@ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
-This document describes techniques for writing backends for LLVM which -convert the LLVM representation to machine assembly code or other languages.
++This document describes techniques for writing compiler backends that convert +the LLVM Intermediate Representation (IR) to code for a specified machine or +other languages. Code intended for a specific machine can take the form of +either assembly code or binary code (usable for a JIT compiler). +
+ ++The backend of LLVM features a target-independent code generator that may create +output for several types of target CPUs — including X86, PowerPC, Alpha, +and SPARC. The backend may also be used to generate code targeted at SPUs of the +Cell processor or GPUs to support the execution of compute kernels. +
+ ++The document focuses on existing examples found in subdirectories +of llvm/lib/Target in a downloaded LLVM release. In particular, this +document focuses on the example of creating a static compiler (one that emits +text assembly) for a SPARC target, because SPARC has fairly standard +characteristics, such as a RISC instruction set and straightforward calling +conventions. +
+ ++The audience for this document is anyone who needs to write an LLVM backend to +generate code for a specific hardware or software target. +
+ ++These essential documents must be read before reading this document: +
+ ++To follow the SPARC examples in this document, have a copy of +The SPARC Architecture +Manual, Version 8 for reference. For details about the ARM instruction +set, refer to the ARM Architecture +Reference Manual. For more about the GNU Assembler format +(GAS), see +Using As, +especially for the assembly printer. Using As contains a list of target +machine dependent features. +
+ ++To write a compiler backend for LLVM that converts the LLVM IR to code for a +specified target (machine or other language), follow these steps: +
+ ++In the .cpp and .h. files, initially stub up these methods and +then implement them later. Initially, you may not know which private members +that the class will need and which components will need to be subclassed. +
+ ++To actually create your compiler backend, you need to create and modify a few +files. The absolute minimum is discussed here. But to actually use the LLVM +target-independent code generator, you must perform the steps described in +the LLVM +Target-Independent Code Generator document. +
+ ++First, you should create a subdirectory under lib/Target to hold all +the files related to your target. If your target is called "Dummy," create the +directory lib/Target/Dummy. +
+ ++In this new +directory, create a Makefile. It is easiest to copy a +Makefile of another target and modify it. It should at least contain +the LEVEL, LIBRARYNAME and TARGET variables, and then +include $(LEVEL)/Makefile.common. The library can be +named LLVMDummy (for example, see the MIPS target). Alternatively, you +can split the library into LLVMDummyCodeGen +and LLVMDummyAsmPrinter, the latter of which should be implemented in a +subdirectory below lib/Target/Dummy (for example, see the PowerPC +target). +
+ ++Note that these two naming schemes are hardcoded into llvm-config. +Using any other naming scheme will confuse llvm-config and produce a +lot of (seemingly unrelated) linker errors when linking llc. +
+ ++To make your target actually do something, you need to implement a subclass of +TargetMachine. This implementation should typically be in the file +lib/Target/DummyTargetMachine.cpp, but any file in +the lib/Target directory will be built and should work. To use LLVM's +target independent code generator, you should do what all current machine +backends do: create a subclass of LLVMTargetMachine. (To create a +target from scratch, create a subclass of TargetMachine.) +
+ ++To get LLVM to actually build and link your target, you need to add it to +the TARGETS_TO_BUILD variable. To do this, you modify the configure +script to know about your target when parsing the --enable-targets +option. Search the configure script for TARGETS_TO_BUILD, add your +target to the lists there (some creativity required), and then +reconfigure. Alternatively, you can change autotools/configure.ac and +regenerate configure by running ./autoconf/AutoRegen.sh. +
+LLVMTargetMachine is designed as a base class for targets implemented +with the LLVM target-independent code generator. The LLVMTargetMachine +class should be specialized by a concrete target class that implements the +various virtual methods. LLVMTargetMachine is defined as a subclass of +TargetMachine in include/llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h. The +TargetMachine class implementation (TargetMachine.cpp) also +processes numerous command-line options. +
+ ++To create a concrete target-specific subclass of LLVMTargetMachine, +start by copying an existing TargetMachine class and header. You +should name the files that you create to reflect your specific target. For +instance, for the SPARC target, name the files SparcTargetMachine.h and +SparcTargetMachine.cpp. +
+ ++For a target machine XXX, the implementation of +XXXTargetMachine must have access methods to obtain objects that +represent target components. These methods are named get*Info, and are +intended to obtain the instruction set (getInstrInfo), register set +(getRegisterInfo), stack frame layout (getFrameInfo), and +similar information. XXXTargetMachine must also implement the +getTargetData method to access an object with target-specific data +characteristics, such as data type size and alignment requirements. +
+ ++For instance, for the SPARC target, the header file +SparcTargetMachine.h declares prototypes for several get*Info +and getTargetData methods that simply return a class member. +
+ ++namespace llvm { + +class Module; + +class SparcTargetMachine : public LLVMTargetMachine { + const TargetData DataLayout; // Calculates type size & alignment + SparcSubtarget Subtarget; + SparcInstrInfo InstrInfo; + TargetFrameInfo FrameInfo; + +protected: + virtual const TargetAsmInfo *createTargetAsmInfo() const; + +public: + SparcTargetMachine(const Module &M, const std::string &FS); + + virtual const SparcInstrInfo *getInstrInfo() const {return &InstrInfo; } + virtual const TargetFrameInfo *getFrameInfo() const {return &FrameInfo; } + virtual const TargetSubtarget *getSubtargetImpl() const{return &Subtarget; } + virtual const TargetRegisterInfo *getRegisterInfo() const { + return &InstrInfo.getRegisterInfo(); + } + virtual const TargetData *getTargetData() const { return &DataLayout; } + static unsigned getModuleMatchQuality(const Module &M); + + // Pass Pipeline Configuration + virtual bool addInstSelector(PassManagerBase &PM, bool Fast); + virtual bool addPreEmitPass(PassManagerBase &PM, bool Fast); + virtual bool addAssemblyEmitter(PassManagerBase &PM, bool Fast, + std::ostream &Out); +}; + +} // end namespace llvm +
In general, you want to follow the format of X86 or PowerPC (in -lib/Target).
+To create a static compiler (one that emits text assembly), you need to -implement the following:
+For some targets, you also need to support the following methods:
Now, for static code generation you also need to write an instruction -selector for your platform: see lib/Target/*/*ISelSimple.cpp which -is no longer "simple" but it gives you the idea: you have to be able to create -MachineInstrs for any given LLVM instruction using the InstVisitor -pattern, and produce a MachineFunction with -MachineBasicBlocks full of MachineInstrs for a -corresponding LLVM Function. Creating an instruction selector is perhaps the -most time-consuming part of creating a back-end.
++In addition, the XXXTargetMachine constructor should specify a +TargetDescription string that determines the data layout for the target +machine, including characteristics such as pointer size, alignment, and +endianness. For example, the constructor for SparcTargetMachine contains the +following: +
+ ++SparcTargetMachine::SparcTargetMachine(const Module &M, const std::string &FS) + : DataLayout("E-p:32:32-f128:128:128"), + Subtarget(M, FS), InstrInfo(Subtarget), + FrameInfo(TargetFrameInfo::StackGrowsDown, 8, 0) { +} ++
To create a JIT for your platform:
+Hyphens separate portions of the TargetDescription string.
Note that lib/target/Skeleton is a clean skeleton for a new target, -so you might want to start with that and adapt it for your target, and if you -are wondering how things are done, peek in the X86 or PowerPC target.
+The Skeleton target is non-functional but provides the basic building blocks -you will need for your endeavor.
++You must also register your target with the TargetRegistry, which is +what other LLVM tools use to be able to lookup and use your target at +runtime. The TargetRegistry can be used directly, but for most targets +there are helper templates which should take care of the work for you.
+ ++All targets should declare a global Target object which is used to +represent the target during registration. Then, in the target's TargetInfo +library, the target should define that object and use +the RegisterTarget template to register the target. For example, the Sparc registration code looks like this: +
+ ++Target llvm::TheSparcTarget; -
TableGen register info description - describe a class which -will store the register's number in the binary encoding of the instruction -(e.g., for JIT purposes).
+extern "C" void LLVMInitializeSparcTargetInfo() { + RegisterTargetYou also need to define register classes to contain these registers, such as -the integer register class and floating-point register class, so that you can -allocate virtual registers to instructions from these sets, and let the -target-independent register allocator automatically choose the actual -architected registers.
++This allows the TargetRegistry to look up the target by name or by +target triple. In addition, most targets will also register additional features +which are available in separate libraries. These registration steps are +separate, because some clients may wish to only link in some parts of the target +-- the JIT code generator does not require the use of the assembler printer, for +example. Here is an example of registering the Sparc assembly printer: +
-// class Register is defined in Target.td -class TargetReg<string name> : Register<name> { - let Namespace = "Target"; +extern "C" void LLVMInitializeSparcAsmPrinter() { + RegisterAsmPrinter+X(TheSparcTarget); } +
+For more information, see +"llvm/Target/TargetRegistry.h". +
+ ++You should describe a concrete target-specific class that represents the +register file of a target machine. This class is called XXXRegisterInfo +(where XXX identifies the target) and represents the class register +file data that is used for register allocation. It also describes the +interactions between registers. +
+ ++You also need to define register classes to categorize related registers. A +register class should be added for groups of registers that are all treated the +same way for some instruction. Typical examples are register classes for +integer, floating-point, or vector registers. A register allocator allows an +instruction to use any register in a specified register class to perform the +instruction in a similar manner. Register classes allocate virtual registers to +instructions from these sets, and register classes let the target-independent +register allocator automatically choose the actual registers. +
+ ++Much of the code for registers, including register definition, register aliases, +and register classes, is generated by TableGen from XXXRegisterInfo.td +input files and placed in XXXGenRegisterInfo.h.inc and +XXXGenRegisterInfo.inc output files. Some of the code in the +implementation of XXXRegisterInfo requires hand-coding. +
-class IntReg<bits<5> num, string name> : TargetReg<name> { - field bits<5> Num = num; ++The XXXRegisterInfo.td file typically starts with register definitions +for a target machine. The Register class (specified +in Target.td) is used to define an object for each register. The +specified string n becomes the Name of the register. The +basic Register object does not have any subregisters and does not +specify any aliases. +
+ ++class Register<string n> { + string Namespace = ""; + string AsmName = n; + string Name = n; + int SpillSize = 0; + int SpillAlignment = 0; + list<Register> Aliases = []; + list<Register> SubRegs = []; + list<int> DwarfNumbers = []; } ++
+For example, in the X86RegisterInfo.td file, there are register +definitions that utilize the Register class, such as: +
+ ++def AL : Register<"AL">, DwarfRegNum<[0, 0, 0]>; ++
+This defines the register AL and assigns it values (with +DwarfRegNum) that are used by gcc, gdb, or a debug +information writer (such as DwarfWriter +in llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter) to identify a register. For register +AL, DwarfRegNum takes an array of 3 values representing 3 +different modes: the first element is for X86-64, the second for exception +handling (EH) on X86-32, and the third is generic. -1 is a special Dwarf number +that indicates the gcc number is undefined, and -2 indicates the register number +is invalid for this mode. +
+ ++From the previously described line in the X86RegisterInfo.td file, +TableGen generates this code in the X86GenRegisterInfo.inc file: +
+ ++static const unsigned GR8[] = { X86::AL, ... }; -// class RegisterClass is defined in Target.td -def IReg : RegisterClass<i64, 64, [R0, ... ]>; +const unsigned AL_AliasSet[] = { X86::AX, X86::EAX, X86::RAX, 0 }; + +const TargetRegisterDesc RegisterDescriptors[] = { + ... +{ "AL", "AL", AL_AliasSet, Empty_SubRegsSet, Empty_SubRegsSet, AL_SuperRegsSet }, ...
TableGen instruction info description - break up instructions into -classes, usually that's already done by the manufacturer (see instruction -manual). Define a class for each instruction category. Define each opcode as a -subclass of the category, with appropriate parameters such as the fixed binary -encoding of opcodes and extended opcodes, and map the register bits to the bits -of the instruction which they are encoded in (for the JIT). Also specify how -the instruction should be printed so it can use the automatic assembly printer, -e.g.:
++From the register info file, TableGen generates a TargetRegisterDesc +object for each register. TargetRegisterDesc is defined in +include/llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h with the following fields: +
+ ++struct TargetRegisterDesc { + const char *AsmName; // Assembly language name for the register + const char *Name; // Printable name for the reg (for debugging) + const unsigned *AliasSet; // Register Alias Set + const unsigned *SubRegs; // Sub-register set + const unsigned *ImmSubRegs; // Immediate sub-register set + const unsigned *SuperRegs; // Super-register set +};+
+TableGen uses the entire target description file (.td) to determine +text names for the register (in the AsmName and Name fields of +TargetRegisterDesc) and the relationships of other registers to the +defined register (in the other TargetRegisterDesc fields). In this +example, other definitions establish the registers "AX", +"EAX", and "RAX" as aliases for one another, so TableGen +generates a null-terminated array (AL_AliasSet) for this register alias +set. +
+ ++The Register class is commonly used as a base class for more complex +classes. In Target.td, the Register class is the base for the +RegisterWithSubRegs class that is used to define registers that need to +specify subregisters in the SubRegs list, as shown here: +
-// class Instruction is defined in Target.td -class Form<bits<6> opcode, dag OL, string asmstr> : Instruction { - field bits<42> Inst; +class RegisterWithSubRegs<string n, +list<Register> subregs> : Register<n> { + let SubRegs = subregs; +} ++
+In SparcRegisterInfo.td, additional register classes are defined for +SPARC: a Register subclass, SparcReg, and further subclasses: Ri, +Rf, and Rd. SPARC registers are identified by 5-bit ID +numbers, which is a feature common to these subclasses. Note the use of +'let' expressions to override values that are initially defined in a +superclass (such as SubRegs field in the Rd class). +
+ ++class SparcReg<string n> : Register<n> { + field bits<5> Num; + let Namespace = "SP"; +} +// Ri - 32-bit integer registers +class Ri<bits<5> num, string n> : +SparcReg<n> { + let Num = num; +} +// Rf - 32-bit floating-point registers +class Rf<bits<5> num, string n> : +SparcReg<n> { + let Num = num; +} +// Rd - Slots in the FP register file for 64-bit +floating-point values. +class Rd<bits<5> num, string n, +list<Register> subregs> : SparcReg<n> { + let Num = num; + let SubRegs = subregs; } ++
+In the SparcRegisterInfo.td file, there are register definitions that +utilize these subclasses of Register, such as: +
+ ++def G0 : Ri< 0, "G0">, +DwarfRegNum<[0]>; +def G1 : Ri< 1, "G1">, DwarfRegNum<[1]>; +... +def F0 : Rf< 0, "F0">, +DwarfRegNum<[32]>; +def F1 : Rf< 1, "F1">, +DwarfRegNum<[33]>; +... +def D0 : Rd< 0, "F0", [F0, F1]>, +DwarfRegNum<[32]>; +def D1 : Rd< 2, "F2", [F2, F3]>, +DwarfRegNum<[34]>; ++
+The last two registers shown above (D0 and D1) are +double-precision floating-point registers that are aliases for pairs of +single-precision floating-point sub-registers. In addition to aliases, the +sub-register and super-register relationships of the defined register are in +fields of a register's TargetRegisterDesc. +
+ ++The RegisterClass class (specified in Target.td) is used to +define an object that represents a group of related registers and also defines +the default allocation order of the registers. A target description file +XXXRegisterInfo.td that uses Target.td can construct register +classes using the following class: +
-def ADD : Form<42, (ops IReg:$rD, IReg:$rA, IReg:$rB), "add $rD, $rA, $rB">; ++class RegisterClass<string namespace, +list<ValueType> regTypes, int alignment, + list<Register> regList> { + string Namespace = namespace; + list<ValueType> RegTypes = regTypes; + int Size = 0; // spill size, in bits; zero lets tblgen pick the size + int Alignment = alignment; + + // CopyCost is the cost of copying a value between two registers + // default value 1 means a single instruction + // A negative value means copying is extremely expensive or impossible + int CopyCost = 1; + list<Register> MemberList = regList; + + // for register classes that are subregisters of this class + list<RegisterClass> SubRegClassList = []; + + code MethodProtos = [{}]; // to insert arbitrary code + code MethodBodies = [{}]; +}
To define a RegisterClass, use the following 4 arguments:
+ ++In SparcRegisterInfo.td, three RegisterClass objects are defined: +FPRegs, DFPRegs, and IntRegs. For all three register +classes, the first argument defines the namespace with the string +'SP'. FPRegs defines a group of 32 single-precision +floating-point registers (F0 to F31); DFPRegs defines +a group of 16 double-precision registers +(D0-D15). For IntRegs, the MethodProtos +and MethodBodies methods are used by TableGen to insert the specified +code into generated output. +
+ ++def FPRegs : RegisterClass<"SP", [f32], 32, + [F0, F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F12, F13, F14, F15, + F16, F17, F18, F19, F20, F21, F22, F23, F24, F25, F26, F27, F28, F29, F30, F31]>; + +def DFPRegs : RegisterClass<"SP", [f64], 64, + [D0, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, D8, D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14, D15]>; + +def IntRegs : RegisterClass<"SP", [i32], 32, + [L0, L1, L2, L3, L4, L5, L6, L7, + I0, I1, I2, I3, I4, I5, + O0, O1, O2, O3, O4, O5, O7, + G1, + // Non-allocatable regs: + G2, G3, G4, + O6, // stack ptr + I6, // frame ptr + I7, // return address + G0, // constant zero + G5, G6, G7 // reserved for kernel + ]> { + let MethodProtos = [{ + iterator allocation_order_end(const MachineFunction &MF) const; + }]; + let MethodBodies = [{ + IntRegsClass::iterator + IntRegsClass::allocation_order_end(const MachineFunction &MF) const { + return end() - 10 // Don't allocate special registers + -1; + } + }]; +} ++
+Using SparcRegisterInfo.td with TableGen generates several output files +that are intended for inclusion in other source code that you write. +SparcRegisterInfo.td generates SparcGenRegisterInfo.h.inc, +which should be included in the header file for the implementation of the SPARC +register implementation that you write (SparcRegisterInfo.h). In +SparcGenRegisterInfo.h.inc a new structure is defined called +SparcGenRegisterInfo that uses TargetRegisterInfo as its +base. It also specifies types, based upon the defined register +classes: DFPRegsClass, FPRegsClass, and IntRegsClass. +
+ ++SparcRegisterInfo.td also generates SparcGenRegisterInfo.inc, +which is included at the bottom of SparcRegisterInfo.cpp, the SPARC +register implementation. The code below shows only the generated integer +registers and associated register classes. The order of registers +in IntRegs reflects the order in the definition of IntRegs in +the target description file. Take special note of the use +of MethodBodies in SparcRegisterInfo.td to create code in +SparcGenRegisterInfo.inc. MethodProtos generates similar code +in SparcGenRegisterInfo.h.inc. +
+ +// IntRegs Register Class... + static const unsigned IntRegs[] = { + SP::L0, SP::L1, SP::L2, SP::L3, SP::L4, SP::L5, + SP::L6, SP::L7, SP::I0, SP::I1, SP::I2, SP::I3, + SP::I4, SP::I5, SP::O0, SP::O1, SP::O2, SP::O3, + SP::O4, SP::O5, SP::O7, SP::G1, SP::G2, SP::G3, + SP::G4, SP::O6, SP::I6, SP::I7, SP::G0, SP::G5, + SP::G6, SP::G7, + }; + + // IntRegsVTs Register Class Value Types... + static const MVT::ValueType IntRegsVTs[] = { + MVT::i32, MVT::Other + }; + +namespace SP { // Register class instances + DFPRegsClass DFPRegsRegClass; + FPRegsClass FPRegsRegClass; + IntRegsClass IntRegsRegClass; +... + // IntRegs Sub-register Classess... + static const TargetRegisterClass* const IntRegsSubRegClasses [] = { + NULL + }; +... + // IntRegs Super-register Classess... + static const TargetRegisterClass* const IntRegsSuperRegClasses [] = { + NULL + }; +... + // IntRegs Register Class sub-classes... + static const TargetRegisterClass* const IntRegsSubclasses [] = { + NULL + }; +... + // IntRegs Register Class super-classes... + static const TargetRegisterClass* const IntRegsSuperclasses [] = { + NULL + }; +... + IntRegsClass::iterator + IntRegsClass::allocation_order_end(const MachineFunction &MF) const { + return end()-10 // Don't allocate special registers + -1; + } + + IntRegsClass::IntRegsClass() : TargetRegisterClass(IntRegsRegClassID, + IntRegsVTs, IntRegsSubclasses, IntRegsSuperclasses, IntRegsSubRegClasses, + IntRegsSuperRegClasses, 4, 4, 1, IntRegs, IntRegs + 32) {} +} ++
For now, just take a look at lib/Target/CBackend for an example of -how the C backend is written.
++The final step is to hand code portions of XXXRegisterInfo, which +implements the interface described in TargetRegisterInfo.h. These +functions return 0, NULL, or false, unless +overridden. Here is a list of functions that are overridden for the SPARC +implementation in SparcRegisterInfo.cpp: +
+ ++During the early stages of code generation, the LLVM IR code is converted to a +SelectionDAG with nodes that are instances of the SDNode class +containing target instructions. An SDNode has an opcode, operands, type +requirements, and operation properties. For example, is an operation +commutative, does an operation load from memory. The various operation node +types are described in the include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGNodes.h +file (values of the NodeType enum in the ISD namespace). +
+ ++TableGen uses the following target description (.td) input files to +generate much of the code for instruction definition: +
+ ++There is also a target-specific XXX.td file, where XXX is the +name of the target. The XXX.td file includes the other .td +input files, but its contents are only directly important for subtargets. +
+ ++You should describe a concrete target-specific class XXXInstrInfo that +represents machine instructions supported by a target machine. +XXXInstrInfo contains an array of XXXInstrDescriptor objects, +each of which describes one instruction. An instruction descriptor defines:
++The Instruction class (defined in Target.td) is mostly used as a base +for more complex instruction classes. +
+ +class Instruction { + string Namespace = ""; + dag OutOperandList; // An dag containing the MI def operand list. + dag InOperandList; // An dag containing the MI use operand list. + string AsmString = ""; // The .s format to print the instruction with. + list<dag> Pattern; // Set to the DAG pattern for this instruction + list<Register> Uses = []; + list<Register> Defs = []; + list<Predicate> Predicates = []; // predicates turned into isel match code + ... remainder not shown for space ... +} ++
+A SelectionDAG node (SDNode) should contain an object +representing a target-specific instruction that is defined +in XXXInstrInfo.td. The instruction objects should represent +instructions from the architecture manual of the target machine (such as the +SPARC Architecture Manual for the SPARC target). +
+ ++A single instruction from the architecture manual is often modeled as multiple +target instructions, depending upon its operands. For example, a manual might +describe an add instruction that takes a register or an immediate operand. An +LLVM target could model this with two instructions named ADDri and +ADDrr. +
+ ++You should define a class for each instruction category and define each opcode +as a subclass of the category with appropriate parameters such as the fixed +binary encoding of opcodes and extended opcodes. You should map the register +bits to the bits of the instruction in which they are encoded (for the +JIT). Also you should specify how the instruction should be printed when the +automatic assembly printer is used. +
+ ++As is described in the SPARC Architecture Manual, Version 8, there are three +major 32-bit formats for instructions. Format 1 is only for the CALL +instruction. Format 2 is for branch on condition codes and SETHI (set +high bits of a register) instructions. Format 3 is for other instructions. +
+ ++Each of these formats has corresponding classes in SparcInstrFormat.td. +InstSP is a base class for other instruction classes. Additional base +classes are specified for more precise formats: for example +in SparcInstrFormat.td, F2_1 is for SETHI, +and F2_2 is for branches. There are three other base +classes: F3_1 for register/register operations, F3_2 for +register/immediate operations, and F3_3 for floating-point +operations. SparcInstrInfo.td also adds the base class Pseudo for +synthetic SPARC instructions. +
+ ++SparcInstrInfo.td largely consists of operand and instruction +definitions for the SPARC target. In SparcInstrInfo.td, the following +target description file entry, LDrr, defines the Load Integer +instruction for a Word (the LD SPARC opcode) from a memory address to a +register. The first parameter, the value 3 (112), is the +operation value for this category of operation. The second parameter +(0000002) is the specific operation value +for LD/Load Word. The third parameter is the output destination, which +is a register operand and defined in the Register target description +file (IntRegs). +
+ +def LDrr : F3_1 <3, 0b000000, (outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins MEMrr:$addr), + "ld [$addr], $dst", + [(set IntRegs:$dst, (load ADDRrr:$addr))]>; ++
+The fourth parameter is the input source, which uses the address +operand MEMrr that is defined earlier in SparcInstrInfo.td: +
+ +def MEMrr : Operand<i32> { + let PrintMethod = "printMemOperand"; + let MIOperandInfo = (ops IntRegs, IntRegs); +} ++
+The fifth parameter is a string that is used by the assembly printer and can be +left as an empty string until the assembly printer interface is implemented. The +sixth and final parameter is the pattern used to match the instruction during +the SelectionDAG Select Phase described in +(The LLVM +Target-Independent Code Generator). This parameter is detailed in the next +section, Instruction Selector. +
+ ++Instruction class definitions are not overloaded for different operand types, so +separate versions of instructions are needed for register, memory, or immediate +value operands. For example, to perform a Load Integer instruction for a Word +from an immediate operand to a register, the following instruction class is +defined: +
+ +def LDri : F3_2 <3, 0b000000, (outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins MEMri:$addr), + "ld [$addr], $dst", + [(set IntRegs:$dst, (load ADDRri:$addr))]>; ++
+Writing these definitions for so many similar instructions can involve a lot of +cut and paste. In td files, the multiclass directive enables the +creation of templates to define several instruction classes at once (using +the defm directive). For example in SparcInstrInfo.td, the +multiclass pattern F3_12 is defined to create 2 instruction +classes each time F3_12 is invoked: +
+ +multiclass F3_12 <string OpcStr, bits<6> Op3Val, SDNode OpNode> { + def rr : F3_1 <2, Op3Val, + (outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins IntRegs:$b, IntRegs:$c), + !strconcat(OpcStr, " $b, $c, $dst"), + [(set IntRegs:$dst, (OpNode IntRegs:$b, IntRegs:$c))]>; + def ri : F3_2 <2, Op3Val, + (outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins IntRegs:$b, i32imm:$c), + !strconcat(OpcStr, " $b, $c, $dst"), + [(set IntRegs:$dst, (OpNode IntRegs:$b, simm13:$c))]>; +} ++
+So when the defm directive is used for the XOR +and ADD instructions, as seen below, it creates four instruction +objects: XORrr, XORri, ADDrr, and ADDri. +
+ ++defm XOR : F3_12<"xor", 0b000011, xor>; +defm ADD : F3_12<"add", 0b000000, add>; ++
+SparcInstrInfo.td also includes definitions for condition codes that +are referenced by branch instructions. The following definitions +in SparcInstrInfo.td indicate the bit location of the SPARC condition +code. For example, the 10th bit represents the 'greater than' +condition for integers, and the 22nd bit represents the 'greater +than' condition for floats. +
+ ++def ICC_NE : ICC_VAL< 9>; // Not Equal +def ICC_E : ICC_VAL< 1>; // Equal +def ICC_G : ICC_VAL<10>; // Greater +... +def FCC_U : FCC_VAL<23>; // Unordered +def FCC_G : FCC_VAL<22>; // Greater +def FCC_UG : FCC_VAL<21>; // Unordered or Greater +... ++
+(Note that Sparc.h also defines enums that correspond to the same SPARC +condition codes. Care must be taken to ensure the values in Sparc.h +correspond to the values in SparcInstrInfo.td. I.e., +SPCC::ICC_NE = 9, SPCC::FCC_U = 23 and so on.) +
+ ++The code generator backend maps instruction operands to fields in the +instruction. Operands are assigned to unbound fields in the instruction in the +order they are defined. Fields are bound when they are assigned a value. For +example, the Sparc target defines the XNORrr instruction as +a F3_1 format instruction having three operands. +
+ ++def XNORrr : F3_1<2, 0b000111, + (outs IntRegs:$dst), (ins IntRegs:$b, IntRegs:$c), + "xnor $b, $c, $dst", + [(set IntRegs:$dst, (not (xor IntRegs:$b, IntRegs:$c)))]>; ++
+The instruction templates in SparcInstrFormats.td show the base class +for F3_1 is InstSP. +
+ ++class InstSP<dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr, list<dag> pattern> : Instruction { + field bits<32> Inst; + let Namespace = "SP"; + bits<2> op; + let Inst{31-30} = op; + dag OutOperandList = outs; + dag InOperandList = ins; + let AsmString = asmstr; + let Pattern = pattern; +} ++
InstSP leaves the op field unbound.
+ ++class F3<dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr, list<dag> pattern> + : InstSP<outs, ins, asmstr, pattern> { + bits<5> rd; + bits<6> op3; + bits<5> rs1; + let op{1} = 1; // Op = 2 or 3 + let Inst{29-25} = rd; + let Inst{24-19} = op3; + let Inst{18-14} = rs1; +} ++
+F3 binds the op field and defines the rd, +op3, and rs1 fields. F3 format instructions will +bind the operands rd, op3, and rs1 fields. +
+ ++class F3_1<bits<2> opVal, bits<6> op3val, dag outs, dag ins, + string asmstr, list<dag> pattern> : F3<outs, ins, asmstr, pattern> { + bits<8> asi = 0; // asi not currently used + bits<5> rs2; + let op = opVal; + let op3 = op3val; + let Inst{13} = 0; // i field = 0 + let Inst{12-5} = asi; // address space identifier + let Inst{4-0} = rs2; +} ++
+F3_1 binds the op3 field and defines the rs2 +fields. F3_1 format instructions will bind the operands to the rd, +rs1, and rs2 fields. This results in the XNORrr +instruction binding $dst, $b, and $c operands to +the rd, rs1, and rs2 fields respectively. +
+ ++The final step is to hand code portions of XXXInstrInfo, which +implements the interface described in TargetInstrInfo.h. These +functions return 0 or a Boolean or they assert, unless +overridden. Here's a list of functions that are overridden for the SPARC +implementation in SparcInstrInfo.cpp: +
+ ++Performance can be improved by combining instructions or by eliminating +instructions that are never reached. The AnalyzeBranch method +in XXXInstrInfo may be implemented to examine conditional instructions +and remove unnecessary instructions. AnalyzeBranch looks at the end of +a machine basic block (MBB) for opportunities for improvement, such as branch +folding and if conversion. The BranchFolder and IfConverter +machine function passes (see the source files BranchFolding.cpp and +IfConversion.cpp in the lib/CodeGen directory) call +AnalyzeBranch to improve the control flow graph that represents the +instructions. +
+ ++Several implementations of AnalyzeBranch (for ARM, Alpha, and X86) can +be examined as models for your own AnalyzeBranch implementation. Since +SPARC does not implement a useful AnalyzeBranch, the ARM target +implementation is shown below. +
+ +AnalyzeBranch returns a Boolean value and takes four parameters:
+ ++In the simplest case, if a block ends without a branch, then it falls through to +the successor block. No destination blocks are specified for either TBB +or FBB, so both parameters return NULL. The start of +the AnalyzeBranch (see code below for the ARM target) shows the +function parameters and the code for the simplest case. +
+ +bool ARMInstrInfo::AnalyzeBranch(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, + MachineBasicBlock *&TBB, MachineBasicBlock *&FBB, + std::vector<MachineOperand> &Cond) const +{ + MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB.end(); + if (I == MBB.begin() || !isUnpredicatedTerminator(--I)) + return false; ++
+If a block ends with a single unconditional branch instruction, then +AnalyzeBranch (shown below) should return the destination of that +branch in the TBB parameter. +
+ ++ if (LastOpc == ARM::B || LastOpc == ARM::tB) { + TBB = LastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB(); + return false; + } ++
+If a block ends with two unconditional branches, then the second branch is never +reached. In that situation, as shown below, remove the last branch instruction +and return the penultimate branch in the TBB parameter. +
+ ++ if ((SecondLastOpc == ARM::B || SecondLastOpc==ARM::tB) && + (LastOpc == ARM::B || LastOpc == ARM::tB)) { + TBB = SecondLastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB(); + I = LastInst; + I->eraseFromParent(); + return false; + } ++
+A block may end with a single conditional branch instruction that falls through +to successor block if the condition evaluates to false. In that case, +AnalyzeBranch (shown below) should return the destination of that +conditional branch in the TBB parameter and a list of operands in +the Cond parameter to evaluate the condition. +
+ ++ if (LastOpc == ARM::Bcc || LastOpc == ARM::tBcc) { + // Block ends with fall-through condbranch. + TBB = LastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB(); + Cond.push_back(LastInst->getOperand(1)); + Cond.push_back(LastInst->getOperand(2)); + return false; + } ++
+If a block ends with both a conditional branch and an ensuing unconditional +branch, then AnalyzeBranch (shown below) should return the conditional +branch destination (assuming it corresponds to a conditional evaluation of +'true') in the TBB parameter and the unconditional branch +destination in the FBB (corresponding to a conditional evaluation of +'false'). A list of operands to evaluate the condition should be +returned in the Cond parameter. +
+ ++ unsigned SecondLastOpc = SecondLastInst->getOpcode(); + + if ((SecondLastOpc == ARM::Bcc && LastOpc == ARM::B) || + (SecondLastOpc == ARM::tBcc && LastOpc == ARM::tB)) { + TBB = SecondLastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB(); + Cond.push_back(SecondLastInst->getOperand(1)); + Cond.push_back(SecondLastInst->getOperand(2)); + FBB = LastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB(); + return false; + } ++
+For the last two cases (ending with a single conditional branch or ending with +one conditional and one unconditional branch), the operands returned in +the Cond parameter can be passed to methods of other instructions to +create new branches or perform other operations. An implementation +of AnalyzeBranch requires the helper methods RemoveBranch +and InsertBranch to manage subsequent operations. +
+ ++AnalyzeBranch should return false indicating success in most circumstances. +AnalyzeBranch should only return true when the method is stumped about what to +do, for example, if a block has three terminating branches. AnalyzeBranch may +return true if it encounters a terminator it cannot handle, such as an indirect +branch. +
+ ++LLVM uses a SelectionDAG to represent LLVM IR instructions, and nodes +of the SelectionDAG ideally represent native target +instructions. During code generation, instruction selection passes are performed +to convert non-native DAG instructions into native target-specific +instructions. The pass described in XXXISelDAGToDAG.cpp is used to +match patterns and perform DAG-to-DAG instruction selection. Optionally, a pass +may be defined (in XXXBranchSelector.cpp) to perform similar DAG-to-DAG +operations for branch instructions. Later, the code in +XXXISelLowering.cpp replaces or removes operations and data types not +supported natively (legalizes) in a SelectionDAG. +
+ ++TableGen generates code for instruction selection using the following target +description input files: +
+ ++The implementation of an instruction selection pass must include a header that +declares the FunctionPass class or a subclass of FunctionPass. In +XXXTargetMachine.cpp, a Pass Manager (PM) should add each instruction +selection pass into the queue of passes to run. +
+ ++The LLVM static compiler (llc) is an excellent tool for visualizing the +contents of DAGs. To display the SelectionDAG before or after specific +processing phases, use the command line options for llc, described +at +SelectionDAG Instruction Selection Process. +
+ ++To describe instruction selector behavior, you should add patterns for lowering +LLVM code into a SelectionDAG as the last parameter of the instruction +definitions in XXXInstrInfo.td. For example, in +SparcInstrInfo.td, this entry defines a register store operation, and +the last parameter describes a pattern with the store DAG operator. +
+ ++def STrr : F3_1< 3, 0b000100, (outs), (ins MEMrr:$addr, IntRegs:$src), + "st $src, [$addr]", [(store IntRegs:$src, ADDRrr:$addr)]>; ++
+ADDRrr is a memory mode that is also defined in +SparcInstrInfo.td: +
+ ++def ADDRrr : ComplexPattern<i32, 2, "SelectADDRrr", [], []>; ++
+The definition of ADDRrr refers to SelectADDRrr, which is a +function defined in an implementation of the Instructor Selector (such +as SparcISelDAGToDAG.cpp). +
+ ++In lib/Target/TargetSelectionDAG.td, the DAG operator for store is +defined below: +
+ ++def store : PatFrag<(ops node:$val, node:$ptr), + (st node:$val, node:$ptr), [{ + if (StoreSDNode *ST = dyn_cast<StoreSDNode>(N)) + return !ST->isTruncatingStore() && + ST->getAddressingMode() == ISD::UNINDEXED; + return false; +}]>; ++
+XXXInstrInfo.td also generates (in XXXGenDAGISel.inc) the +SelectCode method that is used to call the appropriate processing +method for an instruction. In this example, SelectCode +calls Select_ISD_STORE for the ISD::STORE opcode. +
+ ++SDNode *SelectCode(SDValue N) { + ... + MVT::ValueType NVT = N.getNode()->getValueType(0); + switch (N.getOpcode()) { + case ISD::STORE: { + switch (NVT) { + default: + return Select_ISD_STORE(N); + break; + } + break; + } + ... ++
+The pattern for STrr is matched, so elsewhere in +XXXGenDAGISel.inc, code for STrr is created for +Select_ISD_STORE. The Emit_22 method is also generated +in XXXGenDAGISel.inc to complete the processing of this +instruction. +
+ ++SDNode *Select_ISD_STORE(const SDValue &N) { + SDValue Chain = N.getOperand(0); + if (Predicate_store(N.getNode())) { + SDValue N1 = N.getOperand(1); + SDValue N2 = N.getOperand(2); + SDValue CPTmp0; + SDValue CPTmp1; + + // Pattern: (st:void IntRegs:i32:$src, + // ADDRrr:i32:$addr)<<P:Predicate_store>> + // Emits: (STrr:void ADDRrr:i32:$addr, IntRegs:i32:$src) + // Pattern complexity = 13 cost = 1 size = 0 + if (SelectADDRrr(N, N2, CPTmp0, CPTmp1) && + N1.getNode()->getValueType(0) == MVT::i32 && + N2.getNode()->getValueType(0) == MVT::i32) { + return Emit_22(N, SP::STrr, CPTmp0, CPTmp1); + } +... ++
+The Legalize phase converts a DAG to use types and operations that are natively +supported by the target. For natively unsupported types and operations, you need +to add code to the target-specific XXXTargetLowering implementation to convert +unsupported types and operations to supported ones. +
+ ++In the constructor for the XXXTargetLowering class, first use the +addRegisterClass method to specify which types are supports and which +register classes are associated with them. The code for the register classes are +generated by TableGen from XXXRegisterInfo.td and placed +in XXXGenRegisterInfo.h.inc. For example, the implementation of the +constructor for the SparcTargetLowering class (in +SparcISelLowering.cpp) starts with the following code: +
+ ++addRegisterClass(MVT::i32, SP::IntRegsRegisterClass); +addRegisterClass(MVT::f32, SP::FPRegsRegisterClass); +addRegisterClass(MVT::f64, SP::DFPRegsRegisterClass); ++
+You should examine the node types in the ISD namespace +(include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAGNodes.h) and determine which +operations the target natively supports. For operations that do not have +native support, add a callback to the constructor for the XXXTargetLowering +class, so the instruction selection process knows what to do. The TargetLowering +class callback methods (declared in llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h) are: +
+ ++Note: on older releases, setLoadXAction is used instead +of setLoadExtAction. Also, on older releases, +setCondCodeAction may not be supported. Examine your release +to see what methods are specifically supported. +
+ ++These callbacks are used to determine that an operation does or does not work +with a specified type (or types). And in all cases, the third parameter is +a LegalAction type enum value: Promote, Expand, +Custom, or Legal. SparcISelLowering.cpp +contains examples of all four LegalAction values. +
+ ++For an operation without native support for a given type, the specified type may +be promoted to a larger type that is supported. For example, SPARC does not +support a sign-extending load for Boolean values (i1 type), so +in SparcISelLowering.cpp the third parameter below, Promote, +changes i1 type values to a large type before loading. +
+ ++setLoadExtAction(ISD::SEXTLOAD, MVT::i1, Promote); ++
+For a type without native support, a value may need to be broken down further, +rather than promoted. For an operation without native support, a combination of +other operations may be used to similar effect. In SPARC, the floating-point +sine and cosine trig operations are supported by expansion to other operations, +as indicated by the third parameter, Expand, to +setOperationAction: +
+ ++setOperationAction(ISD::FSIN, MVT::f32, Expand); +setOperationAction(ISD::FCOS, MVT::f32, Expand); ++
+For some operations, simple type promotion or operation expansion may be +insufficient. In some cases, a special intrinsic function must be implemented. +
+ ++For example, a constant value may require special treatment, or an operation may +require spilling and restoring registers in the stack and working with register +allocators. +
+ ++As seen in SparcISelLowering.cpp code below, to perform a type +conversion from a floating point value to a signed integer, first the +setOperationAction should be called with Custom as the third +parameter: +
+ ++setOperationAction(ISD::FP_TO_SINT, MVT::i32, Custom); ++
+In the LowerOperation method, for each Custom operation, a +case statement should be added to indicate what function to call. In the +following code, an FP_TO_SINT opcode will call +the LowerFP_TO_SINT method: +
+ ++SDValue SparcTargetLowering::LowerOperation(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) { + switch (Op.getOpcode()) { + case ISD::FP_TO_SINT: return LowerFP_TO_SINT(Op, DAG); + ... + } +} ++
+Finally, the LowerFP_TO_SINT method is implemented, using an FP +register to convert the floating-point value to an integer. +
+ ++static SDValue LowerFP_TO_SINT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) { + assert(Op.getValueType() == MVT::i32); + Op = DAG.getNode(SPISD::FTOI, MVT::f32, Op.getOperand(0)); + return DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, MVT::i32, Op); +} ++
+The Legal LegalizeAction enum value simply indicates that an +operation is natively supported. Legal represents the default +condition, so it is rarely used. In SparcISelLowering.cpp, the action +for CTPOP (an operation to count the bits set in an integer) is +natively supported only for SPARC v9. The following code enables +the Expand conversion technique for non-v9 SPARC implementations. +
+ ++setOperationAction(ISD::CTPOP, MVT::i32, Expand); +... +if (TM.getSubtarget<SparcSubtarget>().isV9()) + setOperationAction(ISD::CTPOP, MVT::i32, Legal); + case ISD::SETULT: return SPCC::ICC_CS; + case ISD::SETULE: return SPCC::ICC_LEU; + case ISD::SETUGT: return SPCC::ICC_GU; + case ISD::SETUGE: return SPCC::ICC_CC; + } +} ++
+To support target-specific calling conventions, XXXGenCallingConv.td +uses interfaces (such as CCIfType and CCAssignToReg) that are defined in +lib/Target/TargetCallingConv.td. TableGen can take the target +descriptor file XXXGenCallingConv.td and generate the header +file XXXGenCallingConv.inc, which is typically included +in XXXISelLowering.cpp. You can use the interfaces in +TargetCallingConv.td to specify: +
+ ++The following example demonstrates the use of the CCIfType and +CCAssignToReg interfaces. If the CCIfType predicate is true +(that is, if the current argument is of type f32 or f64), then +the action is performed. In this case, the CCAssignToReg action assigns +the argument value to the first available register: either R0 +or R1. +
+ ++CCIfType<[f32,f64], CCAssignToReg<[R0, R1]>> ++
+SparcCallingConv.td contains definitions for a target-specific +return-value calling convention (RetCC_Sparc32) and a basic 32-bit C calling +convention (CC_Sparc32). The definition of RetCC_Sparc32 +(shown below) indicates which registers are used for specified scalar return +types. A single-precision float is returned to register F0, and a +double-precision float goes to register D0. A 32-bit integer is +returned in register I0 or I1. +
+ ++def RetCC_Sparc32 : CallingConv<[ + CCIfType<[i32], CCAssignToReg<[I0, I1]>>, + CCIfType<[f32], CCAssignToReg<[F0]>>, + CCIfType<[f64], CCAssignToReg<[D0]>> +]>; ++
+The definition of CC_Sparc32 in SparcCallingConv.td introduces +CCAssignToStack, which assigns the value to a stack slot with the +specified size and alignment. In the example below, the first parameter, 4, +indicates the size of the slot, and the second parameter, also 4, indicates the +stack alignment along 4-byte units. (Special cases: if size is zero, then the +ABI size is used; if alignment is zero, then the ABI alignment is used.) +
+ ++def CC_Sparc32 : CallingConv<[ + // All arguments get passed in integer registers if there is space. + CCIfType<[i32, f32, f64], CCAssignToReg<[I0, I1, I2, I3, I4, I5]>>, + CCAssignToStack<4, 4> +]>; ++
+CCDelegateTo is another commonly used interface, which tries to find a +specified sub-calling convention, and, if a match is found, it is invoked. In +the following example (in X86CallingConv.td), the definition of +RetCC_X86_32_C ends with CCDelegateTo. After the current value +is assigned to the register ST0 or ST1, +the RetCC_X86Common is invoked. +
+ ++def RetCC_X86_32_C : CallingConv<[ + CCIfType<[f32], CCAssignToReg<[ST0, ST1]>>, + CCIfType<[f64], CCAssignToReg<[ST0, ST1]>>, + CCDelegateTo<RetCC_X86Common> +]>; ++
+CCIfCC is an interface that attempts to match the given name to the +current calling convention. If the name identifies the current calling +convention, then a specified action is invoked. In the following example (in +X86CallingConv.td), if the Fast calling convention is in use, +then RetCC_X86_32_Fast is invoked. If the SSECall calling +convention is in use, then RetCC_X86_32_SSE is invoked. +
+ ++def RetCC_X86_32 : CallingConv<[ + CCIfCC<"CallingConv::Fast", CCDelegateTo<RetCC_X86_32_Fast>>, + CCIfCC<"CallingConv::X86_SSECall", CCDelegateTo<RetCC_X86_32_SSE>>, + CCDelegateTo<RetCC_X86_32_C> +]>; ++
Other calling convention interfaces include:
+ ++During the code emission stage, the code generator may utilize an LLVM pass to +produce assembly output. To do this, you want to implement the code for a +printer that converts LLVM IR to a GAS-format assembly language for your target +machine, using the following steps: +
+ ++The code in XXXTargetAsmInfo.h is usually a trivial declaration of the +XXXTargetAsmInfo class for use in XXXTargetAsmInfo.cpp. +Similarly, XXXTargetAsmInfo.cpp usually has a few declarations of +XXXTargetAsmInfo replacement values that override the default values +in TargetAsmInfo.cpp. For example in SparcTargetAsmInfo.cpp: +
+ ++SparcTargetAsmInfo::SparcTargetAsmInfo(const SparcTargetMachine &TM) { + Data16bitsDirective = "\t.half\t"; + Data32bitsDirective = "\t.word\t"; + Data64bitsDirective = 0; // .xword is only supported by V9. + ZeroDirective = "\t.skip\t"; + CommentString = "!"; + ConstantPoolSection = "\t.section \".rodata\",#alloc\n"; +} ++
+The X86 assembly printer implementation (X86TargetAsmInfo) is an +example where the target specific TargetAsmInfo class uses an +overridden methods: ExpandInlineAsm. +
+ ++A target-specific implementation of AsmPrinter is written in +XXXAsmPrinter.cpp, which implements the AsmPrinter class that +converts the LLVM to printable assembly. The implementation must include the +following headers that have declarations for the AsmPrinter and +MachineFunctionPass classes. The MachineFunctionPass is a +subclass of FunctionPass. +
+ ++#include "llvm/CodeGen/AsmPrinter.h" +#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h" ++
+As a FunctionPass, AsmPrinter first +calls doInitialization to set up the AsmPrinter. In +SparcAsmPrinter, a Mangler object is instantiated to process +variable names. +
+ ++In XXXAsmPrinter.cpp, the runOnMachineFunction method +(declared in MachineFunctionPass) must be implemented +for XXXAsmPrinter. In MachineFunctionPass, +the runOnFunction method invokes runOnMachineFunction. +Target-specific implementations of runOnMachineFunction differ, but +generally do the following to process each machine function: +
+ ++The XXXAsmPrinter implementation must also include the code generated +by TableGen that is output in the XXXGenAsmWriter.inc file. The code +in XXXGenAsmWriter.inc contains an implementation of the +printInstruction method that may call these methods: +
+ ++The implementations of printDeclare, printImplicitDef, +printInlineAsm, and printLabel in AsmPrinter.cpp are +generally adequate for printing assembly and do not need to be +overridden. (printBasicBlockLabel is another method that is implemented +in AsmPrinter.cpp that may be directly used in an implementation of +XXXAsmPrinter.) +
+ ++The printOperand method is implemented with a long switch/case +statement for the type of operand: register, immediate, basic block, external +symbol, global address, constant pool index, or jump table index. For an +instruction with a memory address operand, the printMemOperand method +should be implemented to generate the proper output. Similarly, +printCCOperand should be used to print a conditional operand. +
+ +doFinalization should be overridden in XXXAsmPrinter, and +it should be called to shut down the assembly printer. During +doFinalization, global variables and constants are printed to +output. +
+ ++Subtarget support is used to inform the code generation process of instruction +set variations for a given chip set. For example, the LLVM SPARC implementation +provided covers three major versions of the SPARC microprocessor architecture: +Version 8 (V8, which is a 32-bit architecture), Version 9 (V9, a 64-bit +architecture), and the UltraSPARC architecture. V8 has 16 double-precision +floating-point registers that are also usable as either 32 single-precision or 8 +quad-precision registers. V8 is also purely big-endian. V9 has 32 +double-precision floating-point registers that are also usable as 16 +quad-precision registers, but cannot be used as single-precision registers. The +UltraSPARC architecture combines V9 with UltraSPARC Visual Instruction Set +extensions. +
+ ++If subtarget support is needed, you should implement a target-specific +XXXSubtarget class for your architecture. This class should process the +command-line options -mcpu= and -mattr=. +
+ ++TableGen uses definitions in the Target.td and Sparc.td files +to generate code in SparcGenSubtarget.inc. In Target.td, shown +below, the SubtargetFeature interface is defined. The first 4 string +parameters of the SubtargetFeature interface are a feature name, an +attribute set by the feature, the value of the attribute, and a description of +the feature. (The fifth parameter is a list of features whose presence is +implied, and its default value is an empty array.) +
+ ++class SubtargetFeature<string n, string a, string v, string d, + list<SubtargetFeature> i = []> { + string Name = n; + string Attribute = a; + string Value = v; + string Desc = d; + list<SubtargetFeature> Implies = i; +} ++
+In the Sparc.td file, the SubtargetFeature is used to define the +following features. +
+ ++def FeatureV9 : SubtargetFeature<"v9", "IsV9", "true", + "Enable SPARC-V9 instructions">; +def FeatureV8Deprecated : SubtargetFeature<"deprecated-v8", + "V8DeprecatedInsts", "true", + "Enable deprecated V8 instructions in V9 mode">; +def FeatureVIS : SubtargetFeature<"vis", "IsVIS", "true", + "Enable UltraSPARC Visual Instruction Set extensions">; ++
+Elsewhere in Sparc.td, the Proc class is defined and then is used to +define particular SPARC processor subtypes that may have the previously +described features. +
+ ++class Proc<string Name, list<SubtargetFeature> Features> + : Processor<Name, NoItineraries, Features>; + +def : Proc<"generic", []>; +def : Proc<"v8", []>; +def : Proc<"supersparc", []>; +def : Proc<"sparclite", []>; +def : Proc<"f934", []>; +def : Proc<"hypersparc", []>; +def : Proc<"sparclite86x", []>; +def : Proc<"sparclet", []>; +def : Proc<"tsc701", []>; +def : Proc<"v9", [FeatureV9]>; +def : Proc<"ultrasparc", [FeatureV9, FeatureV8Deprecated]>; +def : Proc<"ultrasparc3", [FeatureV9, FeatureV8Deprecated]>; +def : Proc<"ultrasparc3-vis", [FeatureV9, FeatureV8Deprecated, FeatureVIS]>; ++
+From Target.td and Sparc.td files, the resulting +SparcGenSubtarget.inc specifies enum values to identify the features, arrays of +constants to represent the CPU features and CPU subtypes, and the +ParseSubtargetFeatures method that parses the features string that sets +specified subtarget options. The generated SparcGenSubtarget.inc file +should be included in the SparcSubtarget.cpp. The target-specific +implementation of the XXXSubtarget method should follow this pseudocode: +
+ ++XXXSubtarget::XXXSubtarget(const Module &M, const std::string &FS) { + // Set the default features + // Determine default and user specified characteristics of the CPU + // Call ParseSubtargetFeatures(FS, CPU) to parse the features string + // Perform any additional operations +} ++
+The implementation of a target machine optionally includes a Just-In-Time (JIT) +code generator that emits machine code and auxiliary structures as binary output +that can be written directly to memory. To do this, implement JIT code +generation by performing the following steps: +
+ ++There are several different approaches to writing the JIT support code. For +instance, TableGen and target descriptor files may be used for creating a JIT +code generator, but are not mandatory. For the Alpha and PowerPC target +machines, TableGen is used to generate XXXGenCodeEmitter.inc, which +contains the binary coding of machine instructions and the +getBinaryCodeForInstr method to access those codes. Other JIT +implementations do not. +
+ ++Both XXXJITInfo.cpp and XXXCodeEmitter.cpp must include the +llvm/CodeGen/MachineCodeEmitter.h header file that defines the +MachineCodeEmitter class containing code for several callback functions +that write data (in bytes, words, strings, etc.) to the output stream. +
+ ++In XXXCodeEmitter.cpp, a target-specific of the Emitter class +is implemented as a function pass (subclass +of MachineFunctionPass). The target-specific implementation +of runOnMachineFunction (invoked by +runOnFunction in MachineFunctionPass) iterates through the +MachineBasicBlock calls emitInstruction to process each +instruction and emit binary code. emitInstruction is largely +implemented with case statements on the instruction types defined in +XXXInstrInfo.h. For example, in X86CodeEmitter.cpp, +the emitInstruction method is built around the following switch/case +statements: +
+ ++switch (Desc->TSFlags & X86::FormMask) { +case X86II::Pseudo: // for not yet implemented instructions + ... // or pseudo-instructions + break; +case X86II::RawFrm: // for instructions with a fixed opcode value + ... + break; +case X86II::AddRegFrm: // for instructions that have one register operand + ... // added to their opcode + break; +case X86II::MRMDestReg:// for instructions that use the Mod/RM byte + ... // to specify a destination (register) + break; +case X86II::MRMDestMem:// for instructions that use the Mod/RM byte + ... // to specify a destination (memory) + break; +case X86II::MRMSrcReg: // for instructions that use the Mod/RM byte + ... // to specify a source (register) + break; +case X86II::MRMSrcMem: // for instructions that use the Mod/RM byte + ... // to specify a source (memory) + break; +case X86II::MRM0r: case X86II::MRM1r: // for instructions that operate on +case X86II::MRM2r: case X86II::MRM3r: // a REGISTER r/m operand and +case X86II::MRM4r: case X86II::MRM5r: // use the Mod/RM byte and a field +case X86II::MRM6r: case X86II::MRM7r: // to hold extended opcode data + ... + break; +case X86II::MRM0m: case X86II::MRM1m: // for instructions that operate on +case X86II::MRM2m: case X86II::MRM3m: // a MEMORY r/m operand and +case X86II::MRM4m: case X86II::MRM5m: // use the Mod/RM byte and a field +case X86II::MRM6m: case X86II::MRM7m: // to hold extended opcode data + ... + break; +case X86II::MRMInitReg: // for instructions whose source and + ... // destination are the same register + break; +} ++
+The implementations of these case statements often first emit the opcode and +then get the operand(s). Then depending upon the operand, helper methods may be +called to process the operand(s). For example, in X86CodeEmitter.cpp, +for the X86II::AddRegFrm case, the first data emitted +(by emitByte) is the opcode added to the register operand. Then an +object representing the machine operand, MO1, is extracted. The helper +methods such as isImmediate, +isGlobalAddress, isExternalSymbol, isConstantPoolIndex, and +isJumpTableIndex determine the operand +type. (X86CodeEmitter.cpp also has private methods such +as emitConstant, emitGlobalAddress, +emitExternalSymbolAddress, emitConstPoolAddress, +and emitJumpTableAddress that emit the data into the output stream.) +
+ ++case X86II::AddRegFrm: + MCE.emitByte(BaseOpcode + getX86RegNum(MI.getOperand(CurOp++).getReg())); + + if (CurOp != NumOps) { + const MachineOperand &MO1 = MI.getOperand(CurOp++); + unsigned Size = X86InstrInfo::sizeOfImm(Desc); + if (MO1.isImmediate()) + emitConstant(MO1.getImm(), Size); + else { + unsigned rt = Is64BitMode ? X86::reloc_pcrel_word + : (IsPIC ? X86::reloc_picrel_word : X86::reloc_absolute_word); + if (Opcode == X86::MOV64ri) + rt = X86::reloc_absolute_dword; // FIXME: add X86II flag? + if (MO1.isGlobalAddress()) { + bool NeedStub = isa<Function>(MO1.getGlobal()); + bool isLazy = gvNeedsLazyPtr(MO1.getGlobal()); + emitGlobalAddress(MO1.getGlobal(), rt, MO1.getOffset(), 0, + NeedStub, isLazy); + } else if (MO1.isExternalSymbol()) + emitExternalSymbolAddress(MO1.getSymbolName(), rt); + else if (MO1.isConstantPoolIndex()) + emitConstPoolAddress(MO1.getIndex(), rt); + else if (MO1.isJumpTableIndex()) + emitJumpTableAddress(MO1.getIndex(), rt); + } + } + break; ++
+In the previous example, XXXCodeEmitter.cpp uses the +variable rt, which is a RelocationType enum that may be used to +relocate addresses (for example, a global address with a PIC base offset). The +RelocationType enum for that target is defined in the short +target-specific XXXRelocations.h file. The RelocationType is used by +the relocate method defined in XXXJITInfo.cpp to rewrite +addresses for referenced global symbols. +
+ ++For example, X86Relocations.h specifies the following relocation types +for the X86 addresses. In all four cases, the relocated value is added to the +value already in memory. For reloc_pcrel_word +and reloc_picrel_word, there is an additional initial adjustment. +
+ ++enum RelocationType { + reloc_pcrel_word = 0, // add reloc value after adjusting for the PC loc + reloc_picrel_word = 1, // add reloc value after adjusting for the PIC base + reloc_absolute_word = 2, // absolute relocation; no additional adjustment + reloc_absolute_dword = 3 // absolute relocation; no additional adjustment +}; ++
+XXXJITInfo.cpp implements the JIT interfaces for target-specific +code-generation activities, such as emitting machine code and stubs. At minimum, +a target-specific version of XXXJITInfo implements the following: +
+ ++getLazyResolverFunction is generally trivial to implement. It makes the +incoming parameter as the global JITCompilerFunction and returns the +callback function that will be used a function wrapper. For the Alpha target +(in AlphaJITInfo.cpp), the getLazyResolverFunction +implementation is simply: +
+ ++TargetJITInfo::LazyResolverFn AlphaJITInfo::getLazyResolverFunction( + JITCompilerFn F) { + JITCompilerFunction = F; + return AlphaCompilationCallback; +} ++
+For the X86 target, the getLazyResolverFunction implementation is a +little more complication, because it returns a different callback function for +processors with SSE instructions and XMM registers. +
+ ++The callback function initially saves and later restores the callee register +values, incoming arguments, and frame and return address. The callback function +needs low-level access to the registers or stack, so it is typically implemented +with assembler. +
+